Skip to main content

Capping Excellence: The NFL Salary Cap


The first salary cap in NFL history was imposed in 1994 at $34.608 million, the equivalent of $57.163 million today.

The current salary cap in the NFL is set at $167 million per team, meaning a near tripling of the cap since its introduction.


According to theory backing the artificial price ceiling, the salary cap offers two reported benefits to the NFL: controlled costs and near-parity between teams. 

How successful has this proved to be, and what are some of the externalities spawning from this restriction?

Well, the low-hanging fruit here appears to be the unforeseen consequences of the salary cap era, which oddly enough share a lot in common with the greater American economy: the NFL has increasingly become artificial, homogenized and even sterilized.

Of course, the salary cap was originally born out of fabulous intentions, aspiring to neutralize the playing field between major and junior market teams.

Whereas teams like the Detroit Lions and Buffalo Bills might otherwise struggle to attract the same level of talent as the Dallas Cowboys and the New England Patriots, the salary cap ensures that teams are at least at parity on the amounts of cash they can dispense for that talent.

However, this appears to entirely overlook the purpose of those investments from the very consumers who subsidize those teams: they want to see the best version of their team on the field, whether they are watching from the stands of a billion-dollar stadium or the comforts of their own home.

The salary cap causes not only an undervaluation of the talent pool by suppressing the sums available to them for any given year; it effectively distorts the financial calculus for every team.

Akin to college campuses across America, where unfathomable sums of government-backed loans and direct subsidies persistently bid up the prices of tuition while failing everywhere to represent the real value of that tuition while ornate facilities and cafeterias pop up every year, the NFL has invested far more in aesthetics and football-irrelevant ventures which fail to proportionately, or remotely, promote the interests of their treasured consumer base who remain desperately attached to the declining traditions of their team.

What’s more, each team’s coaching staff pours tremendous quantities of energy and countless hours of labor into the development of their programs, their playbook and athletes, tailored each year around their present rosters.

Not only does the staff coach up these players when they arrive on site, but they heavily scout their athletes to find diamonds in the rough, such as Chris Canty, Tony Romo, Dak Prescott and the famed sixth-round pick out of the University of Michigan, Tom Brady. 

All of these endeavors come at a cost not directly expressed in monetary terms at the onset, while the expression of their success only later manifests to their own detriment through a weighty appreciation of that athlete’s market value. 

And of course, because of the salary cap, the team may shoulder this weight for only a limited number of athletes before reaching the limit. 

In this case, the team is tacitly incentivized to restrict the budding athlete’s performance before locking him into a long-term contract, otherwise jeopardizing millions of dollars in cap space or losing the developed athlete to another team whose cap room enables a greater investment.

In this case, the athlete then joins a team that must restructure its playbook to accommodate a new athlete, while the athlete and fans must settle for an arrangement of lower quality, in terms of both contract value and football outcomes.

To deliver this point, let’s focus on the case of nine-time Pro Bowler DeMarcus Ware, drafted by the Dallas Cowboys out of Troy University in the first round of the 2005 NFL Draft.

Before the addition of DeMarcus Ware, the Cowboys employed a 4-3 defensive scheme. 

Upon his arrival and drafting additional defensive talent, including Marcus Spears, Kevin Burnett, Chris Canty and Jay Ratliff, all from that same 2005 NFL Draft, the Cowboys switched to a 3-4 defense to accommodate their new talent.

In the following three drafts, the Cowboys would then enlist the likes of Jason Hatcher, Anthony Spencer and Mike Jenkins, all of whom would reach the Pro Bowl at least once in their careers.

By the beginning of the 2015 season, every one of these athletes had moved on to another team.

Another example of the salary cap’s effects can be traced back to the 2007 NFL season, when the Dallas Cowboys finished with thirteen wins and only three losses, sending a record thirteen players to the Pro Bowl. 

Just three seasons later, only four of those players remained on the team’s roster, as the others left in pursuit of bigger contracts.  

Part of the fandom experience is following the progress of developing talent.

This enables the fan to engage at a far more intimate and personal level, as he or she develops a sort of relationship with the players on the field. 

As fans, we purchase the jerseys of teams but also players, and we popularize chants and nicknames for athletes and core members of the team. 

Remember the Doomsday Defense, the Steel Curtain, the Big Blue Wrecking Crew, the Bruise Brothers, and the Purple People Eaters?

These were all made possible in a cap-less era, when developed talent remained with their teams and specifically honed their skills alongside familiar faces within familiar concepts.

Where we find transient athletes moving between teams, we cannot account for the frictional cost of time lost to learning a new playbook and the idiosyncrasies of a new team. 

Likewise, we cannot account for the learning curve for coaches becoming acquainted with their new athletes.

One of the greatest misfortunes about the salary cap is that one player’s achievement can simply be the manifest expression of the success of the whole unit, and where we find one athlete’s excellence, we might also find that this individual purely complements the whole.

And so the acclaimed athlete eventually moves on to another team of inferior rank, instead of continuing to build the program in which he had flourished, and his new team fails to complement him with a competent surrounding staff as their former top talents also left for other lacking teams filling major roster gaps.

And so the vicious cycle continues, as the NFL salary cap aspires to flatten the terrain of the playing field to mediocritize the league, make the games more about fanfare and the stadiums, and sell jerseys of players who will be gone in three to four seasons.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century. 

Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties? 

The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery. 

It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession. 

It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860.

It was a war that would blur the lines and jurisdictions between sovereign states, that would indiscriminately sacrifice the founding principles etched …

The Evils of Facebook in the War Against Reason

Facebook is one of the greatest frauds whereby thoughtless friends share or tacitly embrace ideas which, in doing so, adds personal, relatable flair to messages being distributed from largely unknown reporters. 

In effect, these friends then subject a wider community to the thought that since their friends are supportive of such ideas, then they ought to carry some merit or authenticity. 

Facebook commits a great disservice to communication, serving primarily to subject meaningful dialogue to inherently-binary measures of laudability or contemptibility. 

Whereas scientific evaluation serves to extract emotion, Facebook serves to embolden the fallacy-ridden supposition that fact follows fanfare, that truth trails trendiness, and that democratic participation (by way of “likes” or “shares”) can reliably support truth or sustainably produce virtue.

What's more, Facebook and other social media sites tend also to further the fallacy that the last breath, or more precisely the final keystro…

One of Every Three American Adults is a Criminal

Earlier today, the Wall Street Journal posted an article on the growing epidemic of criminal records. The article reports that nearly one out of every three American adults has a criminal record — a statistic corroborated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, whose records show 77.7 million individuals on file in the organization's master criminal database. Is this an indication of a society which is becoming more violent and criminal, or of one which is becoming ever-populated with needless and overreaching laws, ordinances, and regulations? In a country whose growing majority depends upon government for salary or entitlements, this is indeed the mechanism through which the dependency is enabled. Some are apparently more than willing to surrender increments of freedom for the promise of free stuff.    

Along with the extensive and pervasive development of laws in the United States, their execution has become more vile and horrid; and the experience of police brutality, along wit…