Skip to main content

MLK: Man, Myth and Legend

Interesting news on Martin Luther King, Jr. has been released this week; though unverified, recently-uncovered FBI documents indicate that political activist Martin Luther King was allegedly involved with a rape in a Washington, D.C. hotel room in 1964, where he reportedly “looked on, laughed and offered advice” to a fellow preacher who committed the act. 



It is precisely this sort of behavior that apparently caused Jackie Kennedy to describe King as a "terrible man" and a "phoney" back in 1964, after she reported that King had bragged of being inebriated at JFK’s funeral, that he had been caught attempting to arrange an orgy during the event. 

This news comes with the release of FBI documents — including audio recordings, which will remain sealed at the National Archives until January 31, 2027 — which have, for some odd reason, been included in the latest "JFK files" release. 

These recordings were likely obtained through bugging and wiretapping efforts by the FBI during the bureau's covert COunter INTELligence PROgram, known colloquially as COINTELPRO, which targeted the surveillance, infiltration, discrediting and disruption of domestic political organizations, chiefly those suspected of ties to communism. 

Of course, the Left immediately mobilized today in defense of MLK, challenging the veracity of these claims and, albeit justifiably, calling into question the reliability of FBI documents. 

Oddly, if it were any other historical figure of any other color or political bent, perhaps a Confederate sympathizer, a Republican, a businessman or any notable figure of European descent or with the loosest of associations with unfashionable behavior, the politicians, talking heads and journalists would have already convicted him — in their own minds, at least  with far less evidence. 

What’s more, the Left appears always ready to defend government when it suits their political agenda, to promote it as the fountain of righteousness, but they somehow get away with selectively rejecting its fidelity wherever and whenever it fails or otherwise undermines their influence or ceases to benefit them personally. 

Across the nation, baseless or otherwise obtuse political rallies have resulted in the removal of monuments, the banning of flags, the renaming of streets and parks for the gradual extermination of certain "intolerable" or "offensive" histories, primarily those related to Southern heritage or the memory of the Confederate States of America

On one particular occasion this year, American University administrators and police officers condemned a peaceful young man after students reported him for sporting a hoodie depicting the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia, otherwise known as the Confederate Battle Flag. 

Similarly, in 2017 one young man, the descendent of a Confederate veteran who fought at Gettysburg, was harassed by a mob of angry protesters at Lee Park in Charlottesville, Virginia, as he peacefully saluted a statue of Robert E. Lee.

The young man believes that the record of the Confederacy has been distorted by groups undermining its cause, chiefly neo-Nazis, the modern Ku Klux Klan, and others under their influence who have misappropriated the banner of the Army of Northern Virginia. 

Since the political outcries, Lee Park has been renamed Market Street Park, and that young man has been expelled from his college in Pensacola, Florida.  

Upon his expulsion from Pensacola Christian College, he remarked, "I believe a Christian institution should support patriotic individuals who want to stand for American tradition and beliefs. It really hurts me a lot when you try to do what's right and you get attacked."

Another student reported that he left Boston University after receiving repeated death threats after participating in a protest against "immigration, multiculturalism and postmodernism."

Meanwhile, at least 110 Confederate memorials have been removed in the United States since 2015; the names of thirty-seven schools, seven parks, three buildings and seven roads have been changed, all in a concerted effort to erase the memory, history and symbols of an era and set of causes that remain profoundly misunderstood by throngs of scandalmongers who are far more eager to protest than to learn. 

It will be interesting to witness the fallout, or lack thereof, following from the recent news on Martin Luther King.

Will the same kind of hysteria follow from these reports regarding King's illicit behavior? 

Will Martin Luther King Boulevards nationwide be renamed? 

Will the monuments, the parks and the societies rethink their icon, their legitimacy or the history that backs them? 

Alternatively, will the talking heads and the politically-minded distinguish between the man, his private life and his contributions to arrive at a more honest conclusion about our world? 

Will we finally avail ourselves of the truth that every historical figure and every human being, however seemingly important or inconsequential, is merely human, fraught with faults just as with talents? 

Unlikely. 

Instead, the majority of acolytes will passively await the value judgment presented by the mainstream media, which will happily tell their audiences what to think. 

They will scurry toward something else; they will work desperately to discredit the evidence or invalidate the messenger; they will find another false prophet, and they will bend every word and sacrifice every measure of truth and honesty for the promotion of their dear idol. 

They will never reconsider their worship, for they refuse to face a world that betrays everything they thought they knew: they’re as thirsty for hope and continuity as for water. 

They’ll simply remember the reruns, the caricatures, the fairy tales, and their cognitive dissonance will drown out the troubling noise with the warm and pillowy embrace of the happy and innocent memories of times past, which are easier to manage than the talons of truth.

This invariably prevents them from ever truly appreciating what's preceded them and what it means to be human.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. Likewise, it was a war that would witness a five-fold increase in the number of civilians employed by the federal government, as federal gove

The Evils of Facebook in the War Against Reason

Facebook is one of the greatest frauds whereby thoughtless friends share or tacitly embrace ideas which, in doing so, adds personal, relatable flair to messages being distributed from largely unknown reporters.  In effect, these friends then subject a wider community to the thought that since their friends are supportive of such ideas, then they ought to carry some merit or authenticity.  Facebook commits a great disservice to communication, serving primarily to subject meaningful dialogue to inherently-binary measures of laudability or contemptibility.  Whereas scientific evaluation serves to extract emotion, Facebook serves to embolden the fallacy-ridden supposition that fact follows fanfare, that truth trails trendiness, and that democratic participation (by way of “likes” or “shares”) can reliably support truth or sustainably produce virtue. What's more, Facebook and other social media sites tend also to further the fallacy that the last breath, or more precisely the f

One of Every Three American Adults is a Criminal

Earlier today, the Wall Street Journal posted an article on the growing epidemic of criminal records. The article reports that nearly one out of every three American adults has a criminal record  —  a statistic corroborated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, whose records show 77.7 million individuals on file in the organization's master criminal database. Is this an indication of a society which is becoming more violent and criminal, or of one which is becoming ever-populated with needless and overreaching laws, ordinances, and regulations? In a country whose growing majority depends upon government for salary or entitlements , this is indeed the mechanism through which the dependency is enabled. Some are apparently more than willing to surrender increments of freedom for the promise of free stuff.     Along with the extensive and pervasive development of laws in the United States, their execution has become more vile and horrid; and the experience of police brutality, alo