Skip to main content

MLK: Man, Myth and Legend

Interesting news on Martin Luther King, Jr. has been released this week; though unverified, recently-uncovered FBI documents indicate that political activist Martin Luther King was allegedly involved with a rape in a Washington, D.C. hotel room in 1964, where he reportedly “looked on, laughed and offered advice” to a fellow preacher who committed the act. 



It is precisely this sort of behavior that apparently caused Jackie Kennedy to describe King as a "terrible man" and a "phoney" back in 1964, after she reported that King had bragged of being inebriated at JFK’s funeral, that he had been caught attempting to arrange an orgy during the event. 

This news comes with the release of FBI documents — including audio recordings, which will remain sealed at the National Archives until January 31, 2027 — which have, for some odd reason, been included in the latest "JFK files" release. 

These recordings were likely obtained through bugging and wiretapping efforts by the FBI during the bureau's covert COunter INTELligence PROgram, known colloquially as COINTELPRO, which targeted the surveillance, infiltration, discrediting and disruption of domestic political organizations, chiefly those suspected of ties to communism. 

Of course, the Left immediately mobilized today in defense of MLK, challenging the veracity of these claims and, albeit justifiably, calling into question the reliability of FBI documents. 

Oddly, if it were any other historical figure of any other color or political bent, perhaps a Confederate sympathizer, a Republican, a businessman or any notable figure of European descent or with the loosest of associations with unfashionable behavior, the politicians, talking heads and journalists would have already convicted him — in their own minds, at least  with far less evidence. 

What’s more, the Left appears always ready to defend government when it suits their political agenda, to promote it as the fountain of righteousness, but they somehow get away with selectively rejecting its fidelity wherever and whenever it fails or otherwise undermines their influence or ceases to benefit them personally. 

Across the nation, baseless or otherwise obtuse political rallies have resulted in the removal of monuments, the banning of flags, the renaming of streets and parks for the gradual extermination of certain "intolerable" or "offensive" histories, primarily those related to Southern heritage or the memory of the Confederate States of America

On one particular occasion this year, American University administrators and police officers condemned a peaceful young man after students reported him for sporting a hoodie depicting the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia, otherwise known as the Confederate Battle Flag. 

Similarly, in 2017 one young man, the descendent of a Confederate veteran who fought at Gettysburg, was harassed by a mob of angry protesters at Lee Park in Charlottesville, Virginia, as he peacefully saluted a statue of Robert E. Lee.

The young man believes that the record of the Confederacy has been distorted by groups undermining its cause, chiefly neo-Nazis, the modern Ku Klux Klan, and others under their influence who have misappropriated the banner of the Army of Northern Virginia. 

Since the political outcries, Lee Park has been renamed Market Street Park, and that young man has been expelled from his college in Pensacola, Florida.  

Upon his expulsion from Pensacola Christian College, he remarked, "I believe a Christian institution should support patriotic individuals who want to stand for American tradition and beliefs. It really hurts me a lot when you try to do what's right and you get attacked."

Another student reported that he left Boston University after receiving repeated death threats after participating in a protest against "immigration, multiculturalism and postmodernism."

Meanwhile, at least 110 Confederate memorials have been removed in the United States since 2015; the names of thirty-seven schools, seven parks, three buildings and seven roads have been changed, all in a concerted effort to erase the memory, history and symbols of an era and set of causes that remain profoundly misunderstood by throngs of scandalmongers who are far more eager to protest than to learn. 

It will be interesting to witness the fallout, or lack thereof, following from the recent news on Martin Luther King.

Will the same kind of hysteria follow from these reports regarding King's illicit behavior? 

Will Martin Luther King Boulevards nationwide be renamed? 

Will the monuments, the parks and the societies rethink their icon, their legitimacy or the history that backs them? 

Alternatively, will the talking heads and the politically-minded distinguish between the man, his private life and his contributions to arrive at a more honest conclusion about our world? 

Will we finally avail ourselves of the truth that every historical figure and every human being, however seemingly important or inconsequential, is merely human, fraught with faults just as with talents? 

Unlikely. 

Instead, the majority of acolytes will passively await the value judgment presented by the mainstream media, which will happily tell their audiences what to think. 

They will scurry toward something else; they will work desperately to discredit the evidence or invalidate the messenger; they will find another false prophet, and they will bend every word and sacrifice every measure of truth and honesty for the promotion of their dear idol. 

They will never reconsider their worship, for they refuse to face a world that betrays everything they thought they knew: they’re as thirsty for hope and continuity as for water. 

They’ll simply remember the reruns, the caricatures, the fairy tales, and their cognitive dissonance will drown out the troubling noise with the warm and pillowy embrace of the happy and innocent memories of times past, which are easier to manage than the talons of truth.

This invariably prevents them from ever truly appreciating what's preceded them and what it means to be human.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

The Keynesian mantra, in its implications, has its roots in destruction rather than truth: “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your guiding principle, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. While it is true that our fates intersect in death, that does not mean that we ought to condemn our heirs to that view: the view that our work on this planet ought only to serve ourselves, and that we ought only to bear in mind the consequences within our own lifetimes.  The Keynesians, of course, prefer their outlook, as it serves their interests; it has the further benefit of appealing to other selfish people who have little interest in the future to which they'll ultimately condemn their heirs. After all, they'll be long gone by then. So, in the Keynesian view, the longterm prospects for the common currency, social stability, and personal liberty are not just irrelevant but inconvenient. In their view, regardless of the consequences, those in charge tod

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. It was a war whose total cost, including pensions and the burial of veterans, was an estimated $12 billion. Likewise, it was a war that would

There's Always Another Tax: The Tragedy of the Public Park

In the San Francisco Bay Area, many residents work tirelessly throughout the year to pay tens of thousands of dollars in annual property taxes. In addition to this, they are charged an extra 10 percent on all expenses through local sales taxes. It doesn't stop there. In addition to their massive federal tax bill, the busy state of California capitalizes on the opportunity to seize another 10 percent through their own sizable state income taxes. But guess what! It doesn't stop there. No, no, no, no.  In California, there's always another tax. After all of these taxes, which have all the while been reported to cover every nook and cranny of the utopian vision, the Bay Area resident is left to face yet an additional tax at the grocery store, this time on soda. The visionaries within government, and those who champion its warmhearted intentions, label this one the "soda tax," which unbelievably includes Gatorade, the preferred beverage of athletes