Skip to main content

Welfare Slavery

The median household in Oakland, California, grosses $52,000 annually, pays roughly $18,000 in income, FICA, fuel, sales and property taxes, for a net take-home of $34,000. 

After the monthly mortgage payment, private mortgage insurance and home insurance, totaling no less than $30,000 per annum, that median household is then left with roughly $300 per month, while the median renter is alternatively left with nearly $900, to cover every other imaginable cost of living, from food and utilities to transportation, clothing and insurance. 

This is precisely why so many Bay-Area residents take advantage of food stamps, why a household grossing $52,000 per year is considered "low income." 

If not for the $18,000 tax liability, that median household could certainly afford to pay for its own food and much more; it could save, invest and plan for retirement, but instead the median household joins the ranks of welfare recipients who, incidentally, politically justify the programs and the administrations that render their insufferable tax burdens so hefty in the first place, which effectively price them out of their independence and self-sufficiency for the benefit of political agendas rife with corruption and abuse by others who have no interest in working or assuming responsibility for themselves. 

This is also why so many Bay-Area residents have declined to work in order to instead default to a state of dependency upon taxpayer largesse, which appears to obviate the need to wake up early, navigate through heavy traffic, deal with colleagues and clients, and perform on the job; which tends to pay better than the median salary anyhow and produces a welcome windfall of surplus time while reducing to zero the cost of leisure. 

In a world of rational actors, it only makes sense that so many men and women would exploit such a system, especially in an environment where the opportunity cost is so uninvitingly slim. 

If only we were to terminate those programs which produce that moral hazard and we were to return those funds to their rightful owners, we could recapture the principles of self-sovereignty and independence which inherently motivate gainful employment, maximize productivity and the pie of production, promote personal responsibility, and empower men and women to achieve fulfillment while extirpating ineffectual behaviors and practices that have indirectly increased the cost of living through the intransigent apparatus that has wielded their plight for their own myopic advantage at the unspeakable cost of untold resources and sums of money; that have, in pursuit of expedience, squandered unquantifiable measures of freedom; that have amounted to the most inconspicuous sacrifice of personal fulfillment, which is attainable exclusively through one's own efforts and self-application, in which capacity government can only render them subservient as slaves to some other end that fails to serve those who accomplished it. 

What’s more, this welfare slavery, a form of fractional slavery whereby abstract numerical shares are siphoned from the product of labor, produces the illusion of a system far more civilized and sensible. 

In reality, of course, these make only for better optics, as the factors are definitionally indistinguishable from the kind of slavery that readily comes to mind for the modern reader. 

Whereas the memory of chattel slavery evokes images of brutality and bondage, the present counterpart is adorned with relatively greater measures of autonomy, whereby loyal servants own some of their own property and tangible commodities and physical produce have been replaced by abstract taxes and fees exacted upon every law-abiding citizen through complex systems masquerading as something other than force, coercion, theft or slavery. 



Even where the modern servant purportedly owns his property, in the case of assets such as real estate, vehicles or securities, he pays fees and taxes on each in order to enjoy them. 

Even insofar as one has accrued monetary wealth, he faces the invisible taxes of inflation, debasement and seigniorage. 

And even where welfare slavery serves the business interests of select industries or enterprises, those costs are paid both directly through subsidies and indirectly through protectionist policies resulting in higher prices paid by the unsuspecting slaves. 

And where the servant has discovered creative methods for shielding his wealth from all of those threats, he faces the real risk, portended by the historical record, of an ambivalent political apparatus that, through executive order, judicial activism, martial law or ad-hoc policymaking, stands always prepared to subvert the rule of law to confiscate property and curtail liberty for the perceived political advantages that can be plentiful enough to justify the vile plunder in the minds of those who stand to benefit. 

On the political front, welfare slavery also serves to diminish skills among the beneficiaries and their offspring, engendering as a side effect more desperate support for the programs and the power of government. 

And where this enveloping institution leaves cracks in the economy by crowding out healthy investment, there too the politician will capitalize by excoriating the free market and capitalism for the dreaded shortfall. 

What’s more, in the end, the cunning political system will have conned its slaves into doing their bidding for them; into working for the immigrants, or imported voters, who embrace their policies; into arguing with each other instead of exposing the great con. 

Welfare slavery will predictably result in a great measure of desperation across a great number of the population, and its pernicious influence will likely continue to be tolerated insofar as it continues to go unnoticed by the many who rationalize it away, who can otherwise imagine a great deal worse. 

Of course, the incremental nature of this institution will surely prevent it from ever being widely appreciated for what it is: slavery incarnate. 

And those aforementioned images from traditional slavery serve to distract from this truth by relegating the speakers of truth to the rank of privileged whiners, while the politicians seek to justify their plunder with prose more strongly resembling poetry, theater or flat-out fiction.

Let us not allow the sophistry to obscure that truth and the very real threat it poses to liberty here and elsewhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

The Keynesian mantra, in its implications, has its roots in destruction rather than truth: “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your guiding principle, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. While it is true that our fates intersect in death, that does not mean that we ought to condemn our heirs to that view: the view that our work on this planet ought only to serve ourselves, and that we ought only to bear in mind the consequences within our own lifetimes.  The Keynesians, of course, prefer their outlook, as it serves their interests; it has the further benefit of appealing to other selfish people who have little interest in the future to which they'll ultimately condemn their heirs. After all, they'll be long gone by then. So, in the Keynesian view, the longterm prospects for the common currency, social stability, and personal liberty are not just irrelevant but inconvenient. In their view, regardless of the consequences, those in charge tod

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. It was a war whose total cost, including pensions and the burial of veterans, was an estimated $12 billion. Likewise, it was a war that would

There's Always Another Tax: The Tragedy of the Public Park

In the San Francisco Bay Area, many residents work tirelessly throughout the year to pay tens of thousands of dollars in annual property taxes. In addition to this, they are charged an extra 10 percent on all expenses through local sales taxes. It doesn't stop there. In addition to their massive federal tax bill, the busy state of California capitalizes on the opportunity to seize another 10 percent through their own sizable state income taxes. But guess what! It doesn't stop there. No, no, no, no.  In California, there's always another tax. After all of these taxes, which have all the while been reported to cover every nook and cranny of the utopian vision, the Bay Area resident is left to face yet an additional tax at the grocery store, this time on soda. The visionaries within government, and those who champion its warmhearted intentions, label this one the "soda tax," which unbelievably includes Gatorade, the preferred beverage of athletes