Skip to main content

The Dollar Funeral Train: The Track to Thralldom

When the dollar finally realizes its destiny, the Socialist States of America will be prepared to ostracize those who planned accordingly. Politicians and their jealous followers will denounce the holders of real assets, namely precious metals, as greedy hoarders of wealth who’ve collectively sabotaged the common currency. 

As of this writing, the US dollar Index (DXY) is roughly 4 percent lower than it was before the Federal Reserve launched QE Infinity, pledging unlimited asset purchases to "keep credit flowing" and "keep the market functioning." For the first time in the history of the Federal Reserve, the central bank will purchase corporate bonds, through purchases of securities in primary and secondary markets and through exchange-traded funds.

According to the Fed, the central bank will "purchase Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities in the amounts needed to support smooth market functioning and effective transmission of monetary policy to broader financial conditions and the economy."

Not to be outdone, a $2 trillion stimulus package is soon expected to make its way to President Trump's desk, where the swipe of a pen will magically credit the Treasury with the funds to presumably stop the economic bleeding. Or so they think. 

In response to the news, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied, posting the fourth best single-day gain in the index's entire 135-year history, outdone by only three days from the epoch of the Great Depression. Two days later, the index has gained nearly 24 percent, capping off its biggest three-day surge since 1931. All of this comes despite a record number of unemployment claims, 3.3 million thus far, and an economy that is broadly grinding to a halt.

Rest assured, every stock-market gain from this point forward is merely symptomatic of unrestrained inflation, and economically-neutral speculation, that will eventually materialize in higher prices in consumer goods. This has been the case since the Great Recession, only it’s more direct and transparent now. 

With job losses rising astronomically, the only positive spin is that they were contained to 3.3 million. Despite all of the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, deteriorating economic prospects, and the unprecedented monetary measures announced by the Federal Reserve, President Trump and members of Congress, the markets are rallying on stimulus and the fear of missing out on what they misinterpret as a buying opportunity. 

We can safely expect the markets to remain irrational and volatile for time to come, and intelligent investors will seize the underbought and oversold assets that investors will invariably rush to buy as the end game becomes imminently clear. Cash will inevitably pass through stocks and bonds, among other financial instruments, before ultimately showing up in real assets and consumer prices.

Only then will the average American encounter the lessons of economics, leaving him only to reflect on what went wrong. Unfortunately, in the face of this adversity, the average American will be less tempted to study economics, more inclined to cast blame and votes in hopes of taking the easy way out. 

With their unwavering loyalty to the dollar and conventional investment vehicles, they will board the train on its farewell tour as the intelligent investors bid adieu. Unbeknownst to the passengers, the fare will cost them everything and then some.



As the dollar continues on its farewell tour, politicians and their constituents will seek out their next targets, whom they'll saddle with the blame before marking them with the scarlet letter. With the benefit of jealousy and desperation, Americans will be ready to accept the most draconian of measures to confiscate wealth in order to prevent the politically-disconnected from threatening the power structure, both politically and monetarily. They will ensure that those holders of real assets either comply with their orders to surrender their wealth or, otherwise, keep quiet about their stash. 

Of course, the vast majority will either wholeheartedly embrace the plan, out of jealousy, ignorance or both, while the remainder of people reluctantly keep silent for fear of exposing their wealth or upsetting the socio-political order; few of the remainder will have much wealth to protect anyway. 

The political elite will exploit the obedience of the average American, his economic ignorance, and his patriotic fervor to preserve the status quo, whether by shifting culpability, fostering social strife, presenting a common enemy, or using smoke and mirrors to misrepresent or distract from the truth: contemporary considerations include such intellectual deceit as the digital dollar, a potential exit strategy for a government and central bank long dead set on nationalizing the economy and maintaining its monopoly over the money supply.

In the depths of despair, and under the sophisticated spell of silver-tongued sophists, the average American will eagerly enlist to combat the enemy, however abstract or whatever the form. The political elite will predictably falsify the record, that of the present condition and that which precedes it, to form a compelling and roughly cohesive narrative. The struggling masses will be glorified as victims, so as to inspire hatred and animosity against those whom the public has rushed to vilify. 

In the veritable war against wealth, nobody will admit of his success; nobody will be allowed to publicly display or enjoy his wealth; and, therefore, nobody will benefit from the transaction of wealth. 

In this space in time of shared adversity, mankind, held inescapably to the labors of the status quo, will casually dismiss that undeniable impulse to shake off the great despotism, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of all Americans; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. 

With their resounding silence, they issue their voice of acquiescence to men who’ve fancied themselves lords in usurping power not remotely conferred to them in the republic’s founding documents, nor in the spirit of its inception or a rich history forged inexorably out of the sovereignty and independence made possible by rugged individuals and families vigilant and ready to dissolve the political bands which compromise the rights of man that make life worth living, among them life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. 

As we confront the obstacles before us, we must remember that we will invariably subject ourselves to life under the new authority, even in the aftermath of the crises before us. With our ignorance and our haste to legislate our way to nirvana, we will equip the power structure with our acquiescence, and the benefit of precedent, to undertake measures and to perform unspeakable acts only creatively imagined in our history. 

We will embolden that structure to condemn mankind to the greatest evils of which force, coercion and social pressure are uniquely capable. We will, in effect, surrender essential freedom for some temporary safety, irreversibly renouncing our most indispensable citizenship in the state of liberty. 

We will have made the state and its agents a repressive force in our communities, our neighborhoods and our daily lives, ceding everywhere the discretion and personal authority that breathe value and identity into the lives we lead and the families and communities we build. 

We will have conferred to the agents of government, and to posterity, our reluctance to assume responsibility for ourselves and our communities, and we will unforgivably leave them to deal with the consequences of our selfish inaction, our lack of courage and foresight. We will have ultimately bound them to a life limited to imagining what freedom was and whether they would ever enjoy it again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

The People's Banner: Why the “Thin Blue Line” Flag Betrays the Spirit of the Stars and Stripes

The American flag — proudly known as the Stars and Stripes — is more than a banner of colors stitched together. It is a living symbol of rebellion, unity, and the sovereignty of the people. It was never originally the flag of a government, but of a movement; not a mark of officialdom, but of revolution.  Having evolved from the Continental Union Flag, its stripes — with their roots in the "rebellious stripes" of the Sons of Liberty — represent resistance to abusive power, a stand against imperial overreach, and a declaration that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed. In this light, the proliferation of the “Thin Blue Line” version of the American flag is not merely a modification of a unique American symbol; it is a mutilation of the flag’s fabric and its meaning. It transforms a people’s flag into a government’s flag, in direct contradiction to its foundational ethos. The Stars and Stripes emerged during the crucible of the American Revolution. Designe...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...