Skip to main content

The Economic Value of Man

Much fanfare surrounds the long-held lies and mystic mythologies which have hypnotized the public conscience: those of equality, the minimum wage, and the so-called "living" wage are but a few examples of the fashionable notions which have blatantly betrayed better judgment for their expedience on the political battlefield, where the casualties invariably number as high in human lives as they do in inconvenient truths. 

Just as with every history ever officially reported, the economic value of man has been broadly politicized and thoroughly distorted, buried under emotional feelings and preconceived notions that prevent the public from ever truly grasping the gravity and implications of their convictions. In the heat of the moment, the parade proceeds inexorably without caution, with the confidence that righteousness measures in the strength of their numbers and the intensity of their voices. Meanwhile, the truth lurks quietly out of sight and out of mind, conveniently relegated to the margins of academic consideration by those out of touch with pop culture that's always due to take precedence. 

The study of economics has broadly undergone one distortion after another, serving nearly exclusively to corroborate the political interest. There's no exception in the manner in which the public generally speaks of labor and wages, where the layman exposes his lacking business acumen along with his ignorance of economic value. 


Economic value can be assessed fairly easily by every individual in any given case. Consider your net consumption in the form of the resources you purchase and exhaust on a daily basis. While entertaining those resources, consider the net product of your labor: how do you replenish that supply of goods through your daily production? 

If the product of your labor is more abstract or indirect, in that you do not work directly in the manufacture of any goods, do your best to trace your daily work to the point of manufacture. If, for example, you are a nurse practitioner or medical doctor, consider the resources you use, along with the salary you eventually expend, by serving each patient; from there, estimate the economic value of each life improved or sustained by the procedure. 

In some cases, the patient's life may not prove economically valuable; in this case, do your best to assess the economic value of the other individuals in that person's life, whose work is materially improved by his survival. A meaningful case must be made beyond the abstract to include this economic value-add in this estimate. 

Without a doubt, each life bears meaning to someone, but it is a wholly different argument to suggest that each life bears economic value. In many such cases, patients generally drain resources from the economy and their households. Rather than inspiring economic growth by some spiritual means, many households simply cut back elsewhere, instead of increasing their productivity, in order to afford to care for a loved one. 

What's more, given the existing makeup of the modern economy, where debt-financed consumption, services and government spending form an increasing share of "economic" activity, a great measure of that activity is unproductive, profligate or wasteful; despite the contemporary methods by which "economic" activity is gauged, most of the activity captured is nothing more than spending induced unsustainably by debt payable inexorably, at some time in the future, in the form of real goods. 

Regardless of the misconception arising from the dubious Keynesian multiplier, whereby spending single-handedly and miraculously spurs economic growth, and regardless of the agreeable opinion that every life is valuable, these are truisms limited to their applications in religion, whether that of politics or spiritual philosophy. 

As for the terrestrial affairs here on earth, the inviolable laws of economics will govern, and their lessons will continue to deal in reality with the genuine limits imposed by the planet's scarcity and the true abilities of man to coordinate its resources. While mankind can occasionally con itself into believing in false idols, in this case the false valuations of assets and occupations, the law of the land invariably returns to rectify the score; and it doesn't care in the slightest what you think.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cost of Government is What It Spends, Not What It Taxes

The cost of government is the quantity it spends, not the quantity it taxes; that cost representing the financial burden imposed upon those who pay the taxes and all who transact within that economy or through its common currency. Likewise, governments can either take the people’s money through taxation or they can take the people’s purchasing power through money-printing (or the like).  Therefore, the argument against tax cuts requires further context to appreciate why tax cuts have failed and will continue to fail to deliver economic growth, especially where those tax cuts promote or serve excess indulgence and cheap speculation. In short, it’s not that tax cuts are inherently destructive, or that reducing the tax liability of the wealthiest in society “doesn’t work”; rather, the fact is that the public debt is so high that the country simply cannot afford those tax cuts without defaulting on its debts or — which is the same — covering them through inflation (i.e. money-printing,...
Post a Comment
Read more