Skip to main content

The Economic Value of Man

Much fanfare surrounds the long-held lies and mystic mythologies which have hypnotized the public conscience: those of equality, the minimum wage, and the so-called "living" wage are but a few examples of the fashionable notions which have blatantly betrayed better judgment for their expedience on the political battlefield, where the casualties invariably number as high in human lives as they do in inconvenient truths. 

Just as with every history ever officially reported, the economic value of man has been broadly politicized and thoroughly distorted, buried under emotional feelings and preconceived notions that prevent the public from ever truly grasping the gravity and implications of their convictions. In the heat of the moment, the parade proceeds inexorably without caution, with the confidence that righteousness measures in the strength of their numbers and the intensity of their voices. Meanwhile, the truth lurks quietly out of sight and out of mind, conveniently relegated to the margins of academic consideration by those out of touch with pop culture that's always due to take precedence. 

The study of economics has broadly undergone one distortion after another, serving nearly exclusively to corroborate the political interest. There's no exception in the manner in which the public generally speaks of labor and wages, where the layman exposes his lacking business acumen along with his ignorance of economic value. 

Economic value can be assessed fairly easily by every individual in any given case. Consider your net consumption in the form of the resources you purchase and exhaust on a daily basis. While entertaining those resources, consider the net product of your labor: how do you replenish that supply of goods through your daily production? 

If the product of your labor is more abstract or indirect, in that you do not work directly in the manufacture of any goods, do your best to trace your daily work to the point of manufacture. If, for example, you are a nurse practitioner or medical doctor, consider the resources you use, along with the salary you eventually expend, by serving each patient; from there, estimate the economic value of each life improved or sustained by the procedure. 

In some cases, the patient's life may not prove economically valuable; in this case, do your best to assess the economic value of the other individuals in that person's life, whose work is materially improved by his survival. A meaningful case must be made beyond the abstract to include this economic value-add in this estimate. 

Without a doubt, each life bears meaning to someone, but it is a wholly different argument to suggest that each life bears economic value. In many such cases, patients generally drain resources from the economy and their households. Rather than inspiring economic growth by some spiritual means, many households simply cut back elsewhere, instead of increasing their productivity, in order to afford to care for a loved one. 

What's more, given the existing makeup of the modern economy, where debt-financed consumption, services and government spending form an increasing share of "economic" activity, a great measure of that activity is unproductive, profligate or wasteful; despite the contemporary methods by which "economic" activity is gauged, most of the activity captured is nothing more than spending induced unsustainably by debt payable inexorably, at some time in the future, in the form of real goods. 

Regardless of the misconception arising from the dubious Keynesian multiplier, whereby spending single-handedly and miraculously spurs economic growth, and regardless of the agreeable opinion that every life is valuable, these are truisms limited to their applications in religion, whether that of politics or spiritual philosophy. 

As for the terrestrial affairs here on earth, the inviolable laws of economics will govern, and their lessons will continue to deal in reality with the genuine limits imposed by the planet's scarcity and the true abilities of man to coordinate its resources. While mankind can occasionally con itself into believing in false idols, in this case the false valuations of assets and occupations, the law of the land invariably returns to rectify the score; and it doesn't care in the slightest what you think.


Popular posts from this blog

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. It was a war whose total cost, including pensions and the burial of veterans, was an estimated $12 billion. Likewise, it was a war that would

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

There is a great deal of substance behind the Keynesian motif, “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your prerogative, your axiom, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. Surely, any quantity or decided cash figure is relevant exclusively to the available produce yielded by its trade. The current valuation thereof, whilst unadulterated, corroborates a rather stable, predictable trend of expectations, whereas its significance wanes once reconfigured by a process of economic, fiscal or monetary manipulation.  Individuals, vast in their interests and their time preferences and overall appetites, are to be made homogeneous by an overarching system which predetermines the price floors, ceilings and general priorities of life. Of course, all of this exists merely in abstract form. However, the supposition proposed by those who champion the agenda of “basic needs” fails to complement the progress achieved by the abolition of presumed guilt by the sole mis

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular studies, such as the MckInsey Global Institute's