Skip to main content

The Gears of Tyranny Keep Turning

My dear wife has been admitted to the hospital, and I’m here as a visitor praying for her health and the health of our unborn baby. Suddenly, our calmness and our peace of mind are shattered by political developments from the California Department of Public Health. 

Following the conveyance of an “order” which they have no constitutional authority to issue, the nurse informed us last night of this new development which will require visitors to show proof of vaccination or negative test result. According to the Public Health Officer of the State of California, hospitals are now required to "verify visitors are fully vaccinated, or for unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated visitors, verify documentation of a negative SARS-CoV-2 test."

Personally I find it ironic that hospitals are reportedly full of COVID cases, yet they want to screen visitors to ensure that they don’t have COVID. Put another way, COVID is reportedly already in the hospitals, but they want to make sure that no visitors have it. 

Even those visitors who are already in the facility, and who've remained there since they were admitted, are suddenly subject to this order. This means that people who agreed to admit their loved ones to the facility, who shoulder the hefty costs of their services, are suddenly met with new terms for their continued treatment; that visitors, who serve an indispensable role in the recovery and welfare of patients, are suddenly being challenged to prove their innocence or otherwise turned away. 

In this way, the "order" applies to visitors who've been confined to their own respective rooms since being admitted to the hospital, who are suddenly condemned as "unapproved visitors" upon the pronouncement of a distant despot unconcerned with the welfare of patients and wholly corrupted by his own political motivations. In this way, people are torn away from their loved ones in their most desperate time of need, all to sustain the unending political charade. 

Meanwhile, whether any patient or visitor is "vaccinated" or "unvaccinated", each still stands to contract and spread the virus upon coming into contact with it; and yet, somehow, a proof of vaccination precludes the need for any visitor to undergo testing. All the while, irrespective of his or her status, everyone must wear a mask. None of this makes any sense. 

Of course, that's because it's not important that this make any sense; it's important only that sufficient numbers of people are brought into conformity with the new status quo, that too few remain to defend the principle being trampled. 

So long as the "unvaccinated" are inconvenienced, the "vaccinated" will assume that they are among the righteous; the "unvaccinated" will predictably dwindle in their numbers as they abandon the principle in favor of some convenience. As soon as they succumb to the pressure, they are no longer sufficiently motivated to defend the principle they ultimately abandoned, and they bolster the ranks of the "approved" and "vaccinated" who continue to punish the "unvaccinated" for their "hesitation" or their unwillingness to conform.  

Meanwhile, I was fortunate enough to already be here at the hospital with my wife before the change took effect this morning; so as I sat here last night in the hospital room as an “approved visitor”, I am suddenly “unapproved” this morning. Meanwhile, my wife and I have engaged unmasked with all of our nurses here and at other hospitals over the past few days, most of whom oppose the “order” and this entire charade, but are merely doing their best to tolerate the imposition while doing their jobs, keeping their mouths shut, and avoiding detection from the powers that be. 

But now we’re all suddenly supposed to pretend to get serious about a problem that doesn’t exist. While my wife is suffering from seizures, preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension, and we’re just trying to hold out to give our baby girl the best chance of a safe birth this Friday, we now have to worry about whether this new “order” will adversely affect us. 

While some people will contend that it’s no big deal, that you can just take a test and be on your way, I will say this: the “test” has changed markedly over the past year and a half, and it has proven wholly unreliable. 

In this way, my chances of witnessing the birth of my daughter, and spending time with her in the neonatal intensive care unit, rest upon the results of an inherently-unreliable test, administered by people who stand to lose nothing by certifying a “positive” result, false or otherwise; who administer the test, to begin with, only to follow “orders” and keep their jobs. As the philosopher Seneca once cautioned, "Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no risk."

This is the kind of society we are condoning as the bullies continue to besiege the people and what remains of their liberty: these are bullies who stand to lose nothing for being wrong, who strong-arm the public into conformity while blindly obeying the orders of their unquestioned masters. 

Despite their feelings about duty, order or whatever, the people who enforce those "orders" hide not only behind their masks, but behind their uniforms and their directives, abstractions accountable nowhere to any human being. For this very reason, wherever they err or go awry, there is no one to blame; the blameless abstraction is always on the move, evolving and elusive, nowhere yet everywhere at the same time. 

In this way, we are brought under a tyranny of and by the people who've forfeited their humanity, their accountability, and even their own personalities for the benefit of a steady salary. All the while, the people grow frustrated and yet have no one to blame, for everyone is merely doing one's job. 

Ultimately, whenever the politicians announce their proclamations from high atop the ivory tower, they stand to impact people in very real and painful ways. 

In condoning more of the government overreach we’ve tolerated over the past year and a half, we invite more of the same kind of impositions which saw people foregoing funerals for parted loved ones, canceling celebrations and special occasions, and forfeiting everything that makes life worth living. 

Worst of all, with our continued acceptance of the same, we will see still more people kept from their loved ones in their time of need, their last moments on earth or, in this case, their very first. 

Regardless of the intentions, we stand to lose everything which unites us and makes us human. We stand to suffer untold sorrows as we’re brought under the rule of the new status quo, undertaken systematically by people unconcerned with its efficacy, unaware of the costs, and unaccountable to the people who stand to lose the most. 

Meanwhile, some people continue to take solace in the terminology which has served them in the past. They take solace in understanding terms such as vaccine and test, and they investigate no further. In this way, they appreciate the form and merely assume the function. 

But this is not a “vaccine” like any other they’ve come to know, and this isn’t a “test” that’s familiar to them either; these are merely words that conceal the uncertainty which lurks beneath the surface, which indeed permeates this entire political act. 

As of this morning, I am more suspicious than ever of the administration and the official narrative. Upon reviewing my wife’s medical records this morning, they erroneously show that she was administered the Moderna treatment on May 28, 2021. Her medical record shows that this treatment was administered externally, not even through our medical provider, which exclusively administers the Pfizer treatment.

This thing is completely fraudulent, and we can only surmise just how far and wide the deception goes. 

But we know more than enough at this hour to identify the fraud and to approximate the risk of tolerating any more of it; we can estimate the damage to be done by allowing this machine to continue undisturbed; and we can see more clearly than ever what we stand to lose in our complacency, as the gears move steadily and rapaciously against the people and their liberty. 

A political activist once explained: 

“There's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part! You can't even passively take part! And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels... upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop!” 

The people of America are at a crossroads, and they must determine for themselves whether they’ll go their own way or continue to be taken for a ride. The fate of freedom and posterity hangs in the balance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...

Taxation Without Representation

During the American Revolution, one of the most popular rallying cries was “No taxation without representation!” This came at a time when the American colonists were being subjected to progressively higher taxes — imposed on progressively greater numbers of goods — levied by the Crown with the assurance that the colonists enjoyed “virtual representation”. Of course, this “virtual representation” was no representation at all, as the “virtual representative” was not elected by the colonists nor disposed to their grievances.  Well, there are those among us who fail to recognize (or to admit) the parallels present in the modern day, where taxes on Americans are not just unfathomably higher than when the colonists decried the injustice; they are just part of the total cost imposed upon a people not present in the negotiations nor properly represented in the government which claims to have resolved the problems of the past. A recent YouTube comment illustrates the misconception: “ T...

Church Over Christ

The true “believer” is revealed by the consistency between his beliefs and his behavior. If someone truly believes that eternal destinies are at stake — that heaven and hell are real, that the consequences are everlasting, and that salvation depends upon faith or works — then the stakes are not merely high but infinite: infinite in degree and in scope, with the effects propagating into the future as humanity continues generation after generation. The number of souls at risk is not just in the billions today but expands indefinitely into the future. If that framework is taken seriously, then the rational response would seem to be an overwhelming sense urgency by those who claim to appreciate the stakes. Everything else — career, comfort, reputation, leisure — would become secondary to the singular task of “saving” as many people as possible. Yet, despite the billions who claim to be Christian — or who claim to believe in any God — there are precious few who make this their life’s purpos...