Skip to main content

America Sold the Farm

There are such fundamental deficiencies among the human species that they can be exposed by even the simplest of tasks. In this case, I present a statement that I think could singlehandedly expose much of mankind for its illiteracy.

Don’t misunderstand me. The human species is uniquely intelligent, but most of them are far better informed than they are prepared to reason. Regrettably, this leaves the modern example of the species feeling superior in virtual every way to his forbears, but little does he know that he’s actually standing on their shoulders; and little does he know the sacrifices and tradeoffs made along the way.  

As it turns out, it doesn’t take much to ascertain the cognitive ability of the people in our lives. Take for instance a simple statement of fact such as this:   

“Racism was neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for slavery.”  

Most people are so braindead and suffer so profoundly from cognitive dissonance that they cannot possibly entertain new information such as this. They are so thoroughly brainwashed that their minds cannot even grasp this very simple concept; a concept, no less, which happens to fundamentally encapsulate some of the primary rudiments of logic. 

I suspect that, even upon grappling with this simple sentence for a few minutes, most people, among those who’d even have the patience to endure those minutes, wouldn’t have even the slightest clue as to its meaning. Among those who emerge with some vague understanding, most will predictably seek refuge in their more familiar conceptions. 

This example serves to illustrate the point that the majority of people are largely empty vessels unequipped with the ambitions as well as the faculties to derive meaningful insights, let alone to engage in honest intellectual debate. 

Most people simply lack the cognitive ability to, as Aristotle is believed to have put it, “entertain an idea without accepting it.” So instead, most people, steeped in cognitive bias, outsource their critical thinking; they prefer to reach conclusions, provided for them by other people or their preferred “experts”, before they even begin to examine the manner in which they were derived. 

For their purposes, it’s both safer and virtually costless for them to obtain and parrot these claims. It’s cheap because it requires precious little effort to obtain, and it’s convenient because most people will accept it at face value simply because they either agree or otherwise prefer to avoid the debate; and it’s safer in their estimation because they bear none of the responsibility for being wrong. After all, it was never their idea in the first place. 

It’s a sad day indeed when you truly accept that most people in our lives are little more than gears in the machine, the raw material used to manufacture the products as well as the illusions we’re expected to maintain. Of course, all of this has been suddenly accelerated over the course of the last century. 

Our lives are faster and busier than ever, yet they’ve simultaneously lost so much of their meaning. We’ve enjoyed so many advantages through the advents of technology and logistics: from trains, planes and automobiles to internet, television and telecommunication, what once took days, months and even years has suddenly become a minor inconvenience; and what once called for physical human interaction has been swiftly replaced by virtual entertainment. 

In that same space of time, we’ve become more connected than ever, but we’ve grown even further apart; we’ve become better informed, but less educated; and we’ve amassed incredible wealth, but we’ve become less resourceful. 

As a people, we have come to sacrifice so much in the way of ethics, ingenuity, faith, family, community, and freedom, and we’ve enjoyed some advantages along the way; but it turns out it was a raw deal indeed. In many ways, mom and dad sold the farm for a lifetime of produce. Little did they know that they were giving up so much more.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

The Keynesian mantra, in its implications, has its roots in destruction rather than truth: “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your guiding principle, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. While it is true that our fates intersect in death, that does not mean that we ought to condemn our heirs to that view: the view that our work on this planet ought only to serve ourselves, and that we ought only to bear in mind the consequences within our own lifetimes.  The Keynesians, of course, prefer their outlook, as it serves their interests; it has the further benefit of appealing to other selfish people who have little interest in the future to which they'll ultimately condemn their heirs. After all, they'll be long gone by then. So, in the Keynesian view, the longterm prospects for the common currency, social stability, and personal liberty are not just irrelevant but inconvenient. In their view, regardless of the consequences, those in charge tod

There's Always Another Tax: The Tragedy of the Public Park

In the San Francisco Bay Area, many residents work tirelessly throughout the year to pay tens of thousands of dollars in annual property taxes. In addition to this, they are charged an extra 10 percent on all expenses through local sales taxes. It doesn't stop there. In addition to their massive federal tax bill, the busy state of California capitalizes on the opportunity to seize another 10 percent through their own sizable state income taxes. But guess what! It doesn't stop there. No, no, no, no.  In California, there's always another tax. After all of these taxes, which have all the while been reported to cover every nook and cranny of the utopian vision, the Bay Area resident is left to face yet an additional tax at the grocery store, this time on soda. The visionaries within government, and those who champion its warmhearted intentions, label this one the "soda tax," which unbelievably includes Gatorade, the preferred beverage of athletes

Death by Socialism

“Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better". That is the title of an article from the World Economic Forum in November of 2016. The title is essentially socialism in a nutshell: no private property, no self-ownership, and no privacy, but somehow, they contend, life will be better.  This is the budding trend in America, away from freedom and capitalism in favor of government and socialism; and the data bear this out. Decades after the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, socialism has reemerged as ungracefully as bellbottom jeans in the classroom and the collective conscience.  According to a 2015 Reason-Rupe survey, 53 percent of Americans under 30 admit to having a favorable view of socialism. Likewise, a 2016 Gallup poll found that an astounding 69 percent of millennials say they’d be willing to vote for a “socialist” candidate for president. For comparison's sake, roughly a third of their parents' gen