Skip to main content

Perception and Propaganda

With capitalism, the freedoms enjoyed and the results produced are evidence enough of its merits; whereas with communism perception relies on a delicate balance of power and persuasion, convincing the public of tales and theories, and the consequences of questioning them. Propaganda is that which seeks to place in the imagination that which is not experienced in reality, whereas market forces dictate to men what little they know about what they imagine they can design. 

This is, perhaps, at the very core of the debate between these two schools of thought: whether society ought to be brought into conformity around designs imagined — notwithstanding the lack of evidence, foresight and basis in reality, notwithstanding the force required to pursue their ill-defined ends — or whether society ought to be permitted to function through the voluntary expressions of individuals left to entertain their own theories, to develop their own visions and explore their own imaginations, to determine for themselves the ends served by their own individual lives. 

This is not only a matter of one of these schools being more pragmatic, more effectual and sustainable in the results produced; it is a matter of morals and ethics, a matter of determining the ends and priorities of life, whether those ends are determined by the individual or elsewhere, the latter being, to the former, functionally invisible and out of reach, functionally unaccountable to the individuals condemned by that determination voiced from on high. 

This is, ultimately, a matter of distinguishing man from machine, feeling beings from factors of production, sovereign man from part of the whole, self-determination from slavery. 

Far from academic, the consequences coming from this debate — the ideas that prevail, whether by acquiescence or approbation — are to decide the future that we have, the nature of our associations, and the world inherited by our heirs; just as importantly, perhaps even more so, is the effect all of this has on the individual’s perception of life and his place in it.

We mustn’t allow skewed perceptions or political propaganda to prevail over the honest and the practical; we mustn’t allow the weight of acquiescence to trample the lives of individuals; and we mustn’t, as a consequence, allow the individual to be reduced in either relevance or autonomy, the very manner in which he factors into his own life, the very extent to which he carries his own destiny, the very freedom he maintains to decide the form and function of his own life, and the very reality of whether he can be said to truly own himself and the product of his labor. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...
Post a Comment
Read more

From BC to AD to AI

Artificial intelligence is bound not only to render the ordinary human being boring by comparison, and in many cases practically unnecessary, but to dispose human beings to hostility toward each other where any dares pose a question or raise a concern instead of taking it up with a chatbot (or AI interface); such a course of action eventually assuming such a regular place in human affairs as to stand in entirely for human discourse and daily interaction.  This is not only a very real possibility when considering the future course of human ‘civilization’; it is more than likely imminent or already upon us.  It is left to be seen just what this will look like, just how this will play out, just what tolerance the species (and even beyond) has for such extremes which this technology is to bring about. Likewise, it remains to be seen whether a heavily-indebted society facing never-ending and unavoidable taxes (i.e. taxes on property) can even be expected to retrain and retool for t...
Post a Comment
Read more