Skip to main content

From Gold Standard to Petrodollar: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire

Since Roosevelt's administration installed the designs of the New Deal era in the United States, the role of government in the lives of the American people has transformed. 

Over the course of World War II and the ensuing intra-Cold War conflicts, the War on Poverty, the War on Drugs, the space race, and the arms race, the United States accrued a tremendous pool of liabilities in order to fund these extravagant projects. 

Following World War II, the United States and the major market powers agreed to Bretton Woods, which established the United States dollar as the benchmark for the rest of the world's currencies. 

The United States dollar was then denominated in units of gold, redeemable at the request of the bearer of those reserves on the international scene. 

By this time, President Franklin Roosevelt had already issued Executive Order 6102 outlawing personal ownership of gold as money or hoarding thereof, but the United States dollar still operated from this system on the international scale. 

By 1971, the United States had long abused its privilege by expanding its money supply, or issuing debt it could never repay, in order to satisfy the whims of over-promising administrations. 

At the time, President Nixon elected to temporarily close the gold window, all in response to the requests for redemption of gold by its international creditors. 

This was, contrary to popular belief, a moment in American history when the United States government effectively defaulted on its debts and admitted its insolvency. 

Shortly thereafter, in order to artificially prop up the United States dollar, Nixon negotiated a system of mutual advantage with the government of Saudi Arabia which would grant the Saudis arms and protections through United States defense while Saudi Arabian oil transactions would be exclusively denominated in United States dollars. 

Subsequently, OPEC espoused this system and the United States government was thus permitted further extravagance with its inflationary monetary policy, over which period of time the United States dollar experienced an expansion of supply on the magnitude of greater than twenty-fold, while the dollar price of gold has soared nearly 5700%. 



Over the course of the past two decades, the United States dollar's global reserve status has waned and its hegemony has been threatened by OPEC nations' refusal to accept further trade in United States dollars, while some of the United States' greatest creditors, including China, have declared their reluctance to hold or accumulate further United States treasuries. 

This imperils the stability of the United States dollar, which is, of course, the lifeblood of the American markets. 

Without this stronghold upon the petrodollar system, the United States dollar will surrender its global reserve status and will vacate its position in the international market as a mere facilitator of trade and exporter of inflation. 

This is the basis of the war efforts in the Middle East today and the impetus for the largely acceptable propaganda Americans regularly observe and accept.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. Likewise, it was a war that would witness a five-fold increase in the number of civilians employed by the federal government, as federal gove

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

There is a great deal of substance behind the Keynesian motif, “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your prerogative, your axiom, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. Surely, any quantity or decided cash figure is relevant exclusively to the available produce yielded by its trade. The current valuation thereof, whilst unadulterated, corroborates a rather stable, predictable trend of expectations, whereas its significance wanes once reconfigured by a process of economic, fiscal or monetary manipulation.  Individuals, vast in their interests and their time preferences and overall appetites, are to be made homogeneous by an overarching system which predetermines the price floors, ceilings and general priorities of life. Of course, all of this exists merely in abstract form. However, the supposition proposed by those who champion the agenda of “basic needs” fails to complement the progress achieved by the abolition of presumed guilt by the sole mis

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators -- who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes --  who have fallen victim to the group think phenomenon, spawning the nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes, and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their supposed market insight.  Roche also references popular studies, such as the MckInsey Global Institute's report whi