Skip to main content

From Gold Standard to Petrodollar: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire

Since Roosevelt's administration installed the designs of the New Deal era in the United States, the role of government in the lives of the American people has transformed. 

Over the course of World War II and the ensuing intra-Cold War conflicts, the War on Poverty, the War on Drugs, the space race, and the arms race, the United States accrued a tremendous pool of liabilities in order to fund these extravagant projects. 

Following World War II, the United States and the major market powers agreed to Bretton Woods, which established the United States dollar as the benchmark for the rest of the world's currencies. 

The United States dollar was then denominated in units of gold, redeemable at the request of the bearer of those reserves on the international scene. 

By this time, President Franklin Roosevelt had already issued Executive Order 6102 outlawing personal ownership of gold as money or hoarding thereof, but the United States dollar still operated from this system on the international scale. 

By 1971, the United States had long abused its privilege by expanding its money supply, or issuing debt it could never repay, in order to satisfy the whims of over-promising administrations. 

At the time, President Nixon elected to temporarily close the gold window, all in response to the requests for redemption of gold by its international creditors. 

This was, contrary to popular belief, a moment in American history when the United States government effectively defaulted on its debts and admitted its insolvency. 

Shortly thereafter, in order to artificially prop up the United States dollar, Nixon negotiated a system of mutual advantage with the government of Saudi Arabia which would grant the Saudis arms and protections through United States defense while Saudi Arabian oil transactions would be exclusively denominated in United States dollars. 

Subsequently, OPEC espoused this system and the United States government was thus permitted further extravagance with its inflationary monetary policy, over which period of time the United States dollar experienced an expansion of supply on the magnitude of greater than twenty-fold, while the dollar price of gold has soared nearly 5700%. 



Over the course of the past two decades, the United States dollar's global reserve status has waned and its hegemony has been threatened by OPEC nations' refusal to accept further trade in United States dollars, while some of the United States' greatest creditors, including China, have declared their reluctance to hold or accumulate further United States treasuries. 

This imperils the stability of the United States dollar, which is, of course, the lifeblood of the American markets. 

Without this stronghold upon the petrodollar system, the United States dollar will surrender its global reserve status and will vacate its position in the international market as a mere facilitator of trade and exporter of inflation. 

This is the basis of the war efforts in the Middle East today and the impetus for the largely acceptable propaganda Americans regularly observe and accept.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...
Post a Comment
Read more

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...
Post a Comment
Read more