Skip to main content

From Survivalists to Subscribers: Leafing through the Pages of Life

The fresh zeitgeist in the Western world appears to have descended from the skies, not from the heavenly halls of divine wisdom but from the delusional doldrums of distant demagogues, the dusty halls of civic centers and the stripped-down storylines thought up by masterful mockingbirds and fairytale authors atop the ivory tower.

Whereas this planet's inhabitant's once carved out their lives, the terrain and the frontiers of those lands, their modern counterparts have been left with the remains of history's civilizations, prohibited from building upon, altering or in many cases even touching the artifacts and regions which depict the inspired endeavors of a time gone by.

Today, the adventurer encounters barbed-wire fences, "no fishing" signs, posted curfews, ubiquitous warning placards, and routine penalties, citations and fines, even possible arrest, for traveling or sleeping across so-called public property.

This property, in addition to its many laws, has become so extensive that it has become nearly safe to assume that one is in violation for something at any given moment, whether for a lack of permit, improper filing or display thereof, or some obscure rule printed on page 368, under section 51, clause 31.

In fact, the breadth of law affects not only the recreational explorer, but more profoundly the visionary, the creator, the inspired entrepreneur who stands to lose so much in pursuit of shared commercial good.

Where mankind once observed unlimited potential and even untapped riches, his modern counterpart faces unrelenting headwinds which desperately encourage him to steer clear of those risky ventures, to instead travel the known and well-documented paths, to pay homage to what has already been done, and to do nothing to disturb those vaunted traditions.

The human specimen is today no better than a physical and anatomical veneer of the impassioned laborers who settled, trailblazed and charted maps we survey and tiptoe around today.

In a very serious sense, the modern person has become a mere subscriber to life, a visitor to a highly-regulated museum or amusement park who passes through as a spectator on a conveyor belt, encouraged to look but not to touch, to admire and graciously salute, but to abandon all of it at the end of the day as neatly-narrated history.



This conditioning program begins in our infancy; when we are instructed to color within the lines, when we are informed of an inherently subjective representation of history; when we are imbued with false proclamations of binary logic; when we are labeled achievers or failures by the estimations of unsophisticated yet definitive standardized tests or by unamenable educators who care more about preserving their position atop the ivory tower than exposing themselves to opportunities for learning and testing their conceptions. 

This conditioning program continues beyond the edifices of education, where the modern person faces myriad incentives to conform to the tested professional playbook, to take the salaried position, to work for a wage, to accept the government job or to depend upon social welfare programs. 

All of this may serve the immediate interests of the person, but absent that vision for improvement he will remain destined for stagnation and the status quo, just as government prefers it.

This whole look-but-do-not-touch, color-within-the-lines philosophy retards the internal human flame of desire, stifles the propensity for progress, and deprives the individual of the most powerful and fulfilling asset on earth: dignity.

This leaves us in adoration of history's achievements yet increasingly complacent with our progress, looking to make do with what's left instead of doing more than we could have possibly imagined.

What's more, we combine this with what has become a far more virtual existence to find that today's people are busier than ever; they're just not producing very much with this labor.

That's because they are constantly inundated with media chatter and social, textual noise which arouses their interest or contempt, drawing them into an inescapable black hole of illogical, unproductive yet entertaining activity which serves to only frustrate the participant, confuse the onlooker, and distract all members from the non-virtual odyssey which remains under-appreciated within us all.

The deliberate complexity of these systems, the rigidity of their appearance, and the believed strength of their social authority, combine to render any resistance apparently futile.

These are the appearances, at the very least.

And so the chatter will continue, chewing away at the spirit of freedom and creativity, reserving no space for anything which contests the pre-ordained map, which interferes with the theme park's itinerary, which threatens to unearth a different storyline, or which serves to rattle the social status quo or the authority and conventions which govern it.

And so we go, like impressionable tabloid subscribers or the daily railway passenger, nestled safely into our vehicles, the boondoggles which guide us, blissfully naive to the world of possibilities beyond, whether feverishly operating within the allowable confines or sluggishly chugging along toward the end of the road. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The Cost of Government is What It Spends, Not What It Taxes

The cost of government is the quantity it spends, not the quantity it taxes; that cost representing the financial burden imposed upon those who pay the taxes and all who transact within that economy or through its common currency. Likewise, governments can either take the people’s money through taxation or they can take the people’s purchasing power through money-printing (or the like).  Therefore, the argument against tax cuts requires further context to appreciate why tax cuts have failed and will continue to fail to deliver economic growth, especially where those tax cuts promote or serve excess indulgence and cheap speculation. In short, it’s not that tax cuts are inherently destructive, or that reducing the tax liability of the wealthiest in society “doesn’t work”; rather, the fact is that the public debt is so high that the country simply cannot afford those tax cuts without defaulting on its debts or — which is the same — covering them through inflation (i.e. money-printing,...