Skip to main content

Fake It Till You Make It: The Method of Half-Wits with Likeminded Followers


The information technology era has combined with a generation armed with fancy words and concepts they don’t completely understand to equip a great many with smart-sounding statements, which ultimately fail the more rigorous test of logic, and a wide audience to receive and celebrate their every utterance. 

So while increasing numbers enjoy the wide-reaching channels of media once employed exclusively by professionals, they exist no differently than the trick-or-treaters on Halloween who do their best to look the part.

 
One key distinction here is that the former may make a more compelling case by glossing over complex concepts with smart-sounding words or pseudo-scientific explanation, without anyone in the audience noticing the difference. 

And while the trick-or-treaters eventually return to their regular attire and reveal their true colors, the con artist continues his charade until he returns home for the night, where he’s either miraculously convinced himself that he actually knows what he’s talking about or, otherwise, where he humbly yet privately acknowledges that he’s dishonestly represented himself. 

Any public announcement of this acknowledgment, however, remains a long shot, as he simply stands to lose too much by that level of honesty — especially as so many have placed such great measures of faith in his pronouncements. 

So, instead, he continues the act into perpetuity, until he’s climbed the proverbial ranks to eminent social or professional approval, he’s reached an impasse where he can no longer justify the con, or he’s been too thoroughly exposed as a fraud to carry on. 

In the latter two cases, there is surely always another aspiring con artist to fill the void, seamlessly filling in for yesterday’s act as if he hadn’t even existed. 

And so without a hitch in the step of socially-fashionable discourse, the inertia beats ceaselessly against the less presentable and more honest outcasts who take sincere interest in seeking the sharpest semblance of the truth, who will not tolerate anything short of cogent and logical explanation, and who will not begin to sell their under-baked goods to the public until they’ve reached completion. 

The same certainly cannot be said about their dishonest run-of-the-mill opponents, who merely pray that their customers don’t notice the difference and, half-heartedly, that they don’t get sick in the process. 

All too often, as it so often appears, disastrous outcomes are uninterested in intentions, nor are they mitigated by them, and the fact that the so-called experts deem them unforeseen or unforeseeable serves only to certify that they were indeed unqualified to testify on the subject in the first place. 

Yet, as is the case with anything measured by bare consensus, this phenomenon will endure so long as unexamined emotional appeals triumph over disciplined discourse and incisive investigation. 

The latter today appears too tall an order for the politically-manipulated, intellectually-disinterested public to stomach, as the uncomfortable jolt would necessitate a reconsideration of all that they’ve learned and all that they’ve believed to be true — or rather, not what they’ve believed, but what they believe they’ve known to be true. 

And this plainly amounts to far too much work for adults who’ve already grown into their principles, who’ve placed their immovable stamps of approval on them, and who’ve got no interest in looking back. 

After all, why would they? 

They needn’t do much more than scan their news feeds or tune in to YouTube to find the next viral philosophical dance which is often more than enough to entrance the unwitting observer, which is so often more than adequate to fake it till you make it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

The Keynesian mantra, in its implications, has its roots in destruction rather than truth: “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your guiding principle, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. While it is true that our fates intersect in death, that does not mean that we ought to condemn our heirs to that view: the view that our work on this planet ought only to serve ourselves, and that we ought only to bear in mind the consequences within our own lifetimes.  The Keynesians, of course, prefer their outlook, as it serves their interests; it has the further benefit of appealing to other selfish people who have little interest in the future to which they'll ultimately condemn their heirs. After all, they'll be long gone by then. So, in the Keynesian view, the longterm prospects for the common currency, social stability, and personal liberty are not just irrelevant but inconvenient. In their view, regardless of the consequences, those in charge tod

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. It was a war whose total cost, including pensions and the burial of veterans, was an estimated $12 billion. Likewise, it was a war that would

There's Always Another Tax: The Tragedy of the Public Park

In the San Francisco Bay Area, many residents work tirelessly throughout the year to pay tens of thousands of dollars in annual property taxes. In addition to this, they are charged an extra 10 percent on all expenses through local sales taxes. It doesn't stop there. In addition to their massive federal tax bill, the busy state of California capitalizes on the opportunity to seize another 10 percent through their own sizable state income taxes. But guess what! It doesn't stop there. No, no, no, no.  In California, there's always another tax. After all of these taxes, which have all the while been reported to cover every nook and cranny of the utopian vision, the Bay Area resident is left to face yet an additional tax at the grocery store, this time on soda. The visionaries within government, and those who champion its warmhearted intentions, label this one the "soda tax," which unbelievably includes Gatorade, the preferred beverage of athletes