Skip to main content

The Uncovered Tragedy of the Welfare State


The welfare state in the United States has accounted for an unfathomable measure of destruction across both the observable map of this country and the psychological profile of its inhabitants. 

The intersection between those two phenomena can be most aptly evaluated through an examination of the welfare state's influence in the composition of the household unit, a contemporary relic of a time gone by.

While the average child in the United States today is 18 percent less likely to grow up in a two-parent household, as compared to 1960, the case for the average black child is even more discouraging: in 1960, roughly 22 percent of black children were raised in single-parent households; today, nearly sixty years later, more than 70 percent of black children were raised in single-parent households.

The emergence of this trend is due not to the increased viability of single-parent households by means of self-sufficiency and the development of female independence.

No, the stark reality is a far cry from the scenario dreamed up in the fanciful imaginations of feminist and leftist demagogues. 

In reality, this is the manifest consequence of a welfare state desperately addicted to the handouts promised by every election's next champion of the next greatest vision. 

Whether it's change or hope or yes we can, the mantra is hardly ever focused on the sobering topics of personal responsibility or self-sufficiency; it's always another get-rich-quick pitch, a powerful sedative or an overnight remedy to a set of problems that are apparently too overwhelmingly daunting for the dispirited complainer to manage.

Instead, the statesman steps to the podium and exercises the bully pulpit to rally support around causes financed through force and coercion, whose certain externalities and moral hazards stand no chance at upending the social inertia which is dead set on its own eventual destruction: in this case, the disintegration of the household unit. 



The disintegration of the American household unit can be traced empirically to the demography of beneficiaries of the myriad programs which fall under the umbrella of welfare programs for single mothers: this umbrella comprises TANF, SNAP, WIC, CCAP, Head Start, LIHEAP, Social Security, and Section 8 and its many contemporary offshoots operating under different labels. 

Indeed, the sharpest disintegration has transpired in the black and hispanic communities over the past half century, since the very beginnings of the celebrated war on poverty during the Great Society epoch. Before this pivotal moment in history, the very converse rang true for the black community, where two-parent households stood as a near-guarantee. 

The economics of this situation also point to government-sponsored subsidies and associated non-profit engagement as enablers in the evolution of this trend, as the households are governed not by increasingly-independent and self-sufficient figureheads, but rather by financially-illiterate or -unstable parents who rely heavily or exclusively on those benefits and other forms of charity. 

These practices, then, propagate out into the future by way of psychological damage, deprivation and dependency through the offspring who grow to develop an intimate understanding of the network of the welfare system, instead of developing the skills and acumen to thrive as individuals who are capable of caring for themselves. 

This author has witnessed this firsthand in the San Francisco Bay Area, through work with the Department of Housing and Urban Development, where seemingly-endless numbers of immigrant and American adults have abandoned lives of self-sufficiency and independence, or even thoughts of achieving that life, for the ease and comforts of surviving on the wide-ranging benefits which are so easily made available to them. In the San Francisco Bay Area, there are even government and non-profit workers who are paid for "engagement" and "outreach" work to register individuals, couples and families for these benefits, in order to further justify the level of federal, state and local funding which flows into these programs. 

In a great many cases, those individuals are encouraged to feign disabilities or homelessness, shelter income, or otherwise decline employment or further work hours in order to remain eligible for benefits. 

The United States has, thus, become a nation warped by a cyclone of easy money, not only by the policies of the Federal Reserve, but by the voracious distribution of benefits to individuals and households at the expense of self-sufficiency, independence and ultimately lives of dignity. 

In short order, once the real funding diminishes in the face of a sovereign debt crisis, these individuals and families will have been made no better off by the programs which served only to suspend reality and distance them from the motivating currents of the world which would have organically impelled them towards lives they could have otherwise sustained of their own might. 

This is perhaps the greatest and most overlooked tragedy of the welfare state.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Kaepernick Craze: Exposing the Nation's Fools One Conversation at a Time

The Kaeparnick craze and other viral movements haven't merely pressured people into becoming simpler caricatures of their prior selves, but they have manifestly exposed people for how foolish and uninformed they've been all along. 



In his final year in the NFL, Kaepernick ranked 17th in passer rating and 34th the year before that. 

He played through an entire season in only two of his six years in the league, and his best full-season performance ranks far outside of the NFL's top-250 single-season passing performances in the league's history. 

For reference, the oft-criticized Tony Romo posted a career passer rating of 97.1, as compared to Kaepernick's 88.9. 

Romo's passer rating dipped below 90 for only one season of the eleven seasons he played, whereas Kaepernick failed to eclipse the 90 mark on three of his six seasons, a full 50 percent of his time in the NFL. 

In fact, Kaepernick accomplished this feat only once if we are to discard those other two seasons in …

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century. 

Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties? 

The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery. 

It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession. 

It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860.

It was a war that would blur the lines and jurisdictions between sovereign states, that would indiscriminately sacrifice the founding principles etched …

Institutional Racism: The Sasquatch of Political Folklore

A great confusion has arisen out of the clamor of political debate, one which presupposes that any dismissal of the merits of “institutional racism” somehow equates to one’s rejection of personal struggle. 

Whereas the struggle of any individual remains always and everywhere unique and wholly personal, his common bond of complexion with others who have struggled serves inadequately as the basis for any argument which regards this commonality as the cause, or as the reason, for that veritable struggle. 

To condemn the unidentifiable and nebulous abstraction, then, by castigating an unnamed institution which persists beyond our specific capacity to recognize its power, serves only to absolve individuals of their personal responsibility, to shift blame and culpability to a specter which exists only by the creative designs of our imaginations, which exists as the scapegoat for all outcomes popularly maligned as undesirable. 

This unactionable practice, then, swiftly and categorically excuses…