Skip to main content

“End Times”

The Bible describes the End Times as a period of difficulty marked by the Rapture, the Great Tribulation, and the Second Coming of Christ. In anticipation of this, the Bible commands us to stay clear of the decadence, the depravity and the people who partake in it: per 2 Timothy 3:1-5, we are to “understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.”

While this warning is evergreen, bearing relevance in virtually all contexts, serving as the most cautionary of tales and worthy of the patient consideration of all who inhabit this planet, there is a problem becoming clearer all the time as society plunges ever further into the abyss, as society wanders confused and anxious through the fog, stepping ever further through ‘end times’ as we know it. 

There is wisdom in this most cautionary of tales, to be sure, however there is just as much a threat posed by people’s understanding of it. Indeed, the problem with the notion of ‘end times’ is not that it is necessarily untrue or inaccurate, but that the common interpretation is flawed and incomplete, that this interpretation contradicts the duties of the modern disciple, and that the ‘believers’ themselves are just as susceptible to the sinister influences of their time; influences often subtle and not obvious but present everywhere. 

Just as with the people whom we are advised to avoid, we are all subject to the forces characterized above, the forces responsible for the outcomes described. This means that ‘believers’ themselves must always, and today more than ever, hold themselves accountable to the dictates of their faith. This means that this is a challenge to be met, not a mere inevitability to be accepted. The latter is precisely why the notion of ‘end times’ has been so dangerous and disarming, and why the subject is, more than ever, worth revisiting. 

The primary issue with the notion of ‘end times’ lies in the response of the ‘believers’, not merely in the decadence and depravity of the unethical, the immoral or the undisciplined whose transgressions are expected. 

The problem with the notion of ‘end times’ is in practice, that it keeps the people complacent, taking comfort in knowing that the end is near and that any effort to avoid catastrophe or even mitigate the damage is futile. Ignoring or suppressing the instinct to survive, at least intellectually speaking, the believer in ‘end times’ fancies himself a member of the enlightened class, the righteous and knowing. It is the great unknown, to be sure: when or whether we are on the precipice of ‘end times’. However, it does us no good where this notion stands to relieve the people of the present or their obligations to their heirs; it does no good to become complacent or even sanctimonious in the comforts of canonical text; kinds of beliefs which, where misunderstood and misapplied, threaten to undermine the great cause undertaken by our forebears to enable our species to not only survive but thrive. 

Had our predecessors embraced the imminence of ‘end times’, had they shielded themselves from hard work behind tenuous intellectual, quasi-Biblical justifications supporting apathy and complacency, there would have remained little incentive for any of them to invest in the future, to maximize their impact in the lives of those around them, to assume the added risks accompanying these tasks. There would have been little incentive to do anything more than that which is necessary to survive, and even that part would become questionable to the many caught up wondering what is the point of it all anyway. 

This is, indeed, a most sinister outlook on life, on the direction of our species, on our place along the timeline, yet it is particularly destructive where this outlook is shared and encouraged. It is one thing to be prepared for ‘end times’, to warn against the ills and evils of sin, to sound the alarm of the reckoning to come, to encourage people toward honest and righteous living, but it is another to arouse panic with no plan, no desire to make one, or to maintain this inevitability as part of one’s plan to excuse himself from honest and fruitful living. 

The historical record suggests that ‘end times’ may not take the forms expected of the many who speak of it, who preach the gospel or recite scripture; that is not to say that this record discredits the notion or the possibility of ‘end times’, but that, despite the many believers throughout human history, our predecessors did not live to see the actual end of ‘end times’ in the physical world, and ‘end times’ did not free them of the stubborn demands of life on this mortal coil. 

It behooves the believer to consider the possibility that ‘end times’ is merely the progressive decay of standards, integrity and trust within society, within one’s own community; a civilization becoming less civilized and less disciplined, progressively indulgent and decadent, ever busier, distracted and impatient, ever more self-centered and self-important, increasingly vain, arrogant, and boastful, and especially susceptible to desires of the flesh, incorrigible and continuing onward — however clumsily — despite a lack of direction and purpose, forgetting the reasons behind the things they do and accept. 

It behooves the ‘believer’ to consider the possibility that ‘end times’ might in fact demand the most from us in preparing our fellow brothers and sisters on this Earth for that reckoning. It behooves the 'believer' to speak of those standards and principles more often, that wisdom resulting in a kind of order and righteousness in tribute to clan and community (and the Lord). It behooves the 'believer' to reject folly (tending always toward decadence, discord and disorder), and it is up to the 'believer' to share the word far and wide, making every effort to persevere in our principles, to ‘save’ as many people as possible, and to preserve for posterity the potential they deserve to inherit with the richness afforded them in a civilization of men and women sharing in that covenant. A covenant not around exasperation or complacency, not around ideas of surrendering, giving up, or retreating into the nothingness of determinism, but around weathering the storms, forging ahead against the great tempests of our time, keeping strength and discipline throughout. That may indeed be the calling of ‘end times’, and if so, we are right to respond accordingly. As it is written in Proverbs 1:20, "Out in the open wisdom calls aloud, she raises her voice in the public square; on top of the wall she cries out, at the city gate she makes her speech". It is the knowledgable who understand; it is the wise who have the courage and the discipline to spread that knowledge and act upon that understanding.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The People's Banner: Why the “Thin Blue Line” Flag Betrays the Spirit of the Stars and Stripes

The American flag — proudly known as the Stars and Stripes — is more than a banner of colors stitched together. It is a living symbol of rebellion, unity, and the sovereignty of the people. It was never originally the flag of a government, but of a movement; not a mark of officialdom, but of revolution.  Having evolved from the Continental Union Flag, its stripes — with their roots in the "rebellious stripes" of the Sons of Liberty — represent resistance to abusive power, a stand against imperial overreach, and a declaration that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed. In this light, the proliferation of the “Thin Blue Line” version of the American flag is not merely a modification of a unique American symbol; it is a mutilation of the flag’s fabric and its meaning. It transforms a people’s flag into a government’s flag, in direct contradiction to its foundational ethos. The Stars and Stripes emerged during the crucible of the American Revolution. Designe...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...