Skip to main content

Being An American

The other day, just for fun, I called and spoke to somebody who lives on one of the Aleutian Islands — the beautiful archipelago stretching westward from the southwestern mainland of Alaska toward Russia. I was studying a world map with my daughters when I figured, Hey, we can actually try to call somebody who lives on one of those remote islands! So I did, and I made contact with a worker at a local bar. As it turned out, the bar wasn’t particularly busy, so she was thrilled to chat, and so we spoke for quite a while. 


She got quite a kick out of the fact that I had just pointed to a place on the map and told my daughters that we’d try to call somebody there. As for me, I get a kick out of the fact that we have so much amazing technology at our fingertips — the kinds of technology that would mystify our ancestors — yet we hardly ever take full advantage of it. I said, It’s amazing that I can just pick up my phone, look up a place in one of the remotest parts of America, and call it — and then, suddenly, we’re talking. 


She agreed.


All in all, we had a really fun and fascinating chat, talking about the TV series Deadliest Catch, the Japanese invasion of the island during World War II, and the bunkers, tunnels, and gun emplacements that were built by the Japanese during the war — many of which remain to this day. These sites are open to visitors, as is the island’s museum, which pays tribute to the events that transpired on the island during the war. 


Over the course of the conversation, I eventually discovered that her family was from North Dakota but that she was born and raised on the mainland in Alaska. 


When she said this, I exclaimed, “Wow, so you’re a real Alaskan, born and raised!” 


She responded, “But I don’t have any Alaskan blood.” 


By that, of course, she was referring to the indigenous groups — including the Iñupiat, Yupik, Aleut, Eyak, Tlingit, Haida, Tsimshian, the Northern Athabaskan, and the Russian Creoles — who’ve called Alaska home for centuries. 


The distinction here, just as it is for Hawaii, is that Alaska is not just a state; it is an identity for a set of peoples. Indeed, it is the difference between a resident and a ‘native’ with deeply-planted roots and a lifestyle and a set of beliefs inextricably attached to the land they call home. 


For this Alaskan lady living on one of the Aleutian Islands, she views herself as a particular type of Alaskan — born and raised there but not to be confused with the indigenous groups who’ve lived there for generations. 


Nonetheless, she is an Alaskan. Her reluctance to assert as much, without hesitation or qualification, is not just a matter of accuracy; it’s the product of generations of Americans being thoroughly indoctrinated and shamed through public schooling and propaganda, and thereby having their sense of identity destroyed, and with it their sense of belonging.


Nowhere is this more apparent than on the matter of what it means to be an American.


As for being an American, there are those who merely reside in America and thus qualify as ‘Americans’; there are indigenous groups often regarded collectively as ‘Native Americans’, but who independently identify themselves by the names of their respective tribes; then there are ‘naturalized’ citizens of America who may not even identify as ‘Americans’, or who may not even associate with American ideas or traditions, and who may even condemn or distance themselves from them, but they too are classified as ‘Americans’, simply for becoming citizens; then there are ‘Americans’ who were born and raised in America, whose own parents were also born in America, and yet who have come to reject or denounce American ideas and traditions, many even going so far as to demand that their fellow Americans do the same, and that they make their voices heard as they announce their defection; and then there are ‘Americans’ who strongly adhere to American beliefs and traditions, who are ‘true-blood’ Americans — ‘patriots’ — who connect with the land, who drink from the streams, who pursue intimate understanding and lasting preservation of their country’s history, heritage, and legacy — the founding principles which have set their country apart from others. From those in the latter camp, ‘being an American’ is more than being a resident of America — it is a cultural and even spiritual identity, not unlike the many who pride themselves as Choctaw, Cherokee, Sioux, et cetera, who in their daily lives, customs, rituals and superstitions, pay homage to their ancestors and honor the unique identities which represent the greatest inheritance of any people.


It is in this way that the discussion around ‘what it means to be an American’ is often confusing for people who don’t realize, or who refuse to acknowledge, that being a true American is much more than a kind of citizenship status. 


Where the title ‘American’ is treated as nothing more than just that — a kind of citizenship status — there is virtually nothing to it, as it then comes to describe little more than a person’s geographical location on the globe; a nominal classification prescribed through government bodies as opposed to an identity describing a person uniquely connected to that land, a person worth calling and getting to know, and an identity substantiated through the unique ideas and institutions that define a people.


Where that becomes the case, there is then nothing to defend — there is nothing of substance in such a neutered term which otherwise, in its full and fertile form, unifies a people around common ideas and shared concepts of goodness, community, justice, ethics, morality, faith, family and proper decorum; the pillars of any society enjoying the intangibles of peace, purpose, trust, and harmony.


And where other such groups — either within America or outside of its borders — maintain a stronger sense of identity (as described), it is the ‘true-blood’ American who is gradually squeezed out of existence, along with his precious principles and the ideas, institutions, and intangibles which make ‘America’ the exceptional place that it is — the kind of place that keeps people wanting to become ‘Americans’, even despite the fact that so few (and progressively fewer in the modern age) know what it means to be one; and despite the fact that so many come to America, from their own home countries, only to (by neglecting to learn or refusing to assimilate) make ‘true-blood Americans’ feel like foreigners in their own. 


For the sake of our own self-preservation, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, and to ensure that our children and theirs will have some place in this world to call home, it is our duty, as ‘true-blood Americans’, to honor the stake and the unique title we’ve inherited. 


It is incumbent upon each of us to remind all ‘Americans’ of the costs paid, the sacrifices made, and the distinctions between ‘coming to America’ and ‘being an American’; that they may be ‘American’ by citizenship but that, in remaining here in our country, we expect them to embrace ‘being an American’ by culture and decorum; to adhere to the expectations of citizenship and to give their allegiance to ‘American liberty’ and the principles which have made this country exceptional and worth migrating to, and which have kept the flame burning brightly as the shining beacon of liberty and prosperity the world over. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

The People's Banner: Why the “Thin Blue Line” Flag Betrays the Spirit of the Stars and Stripes

The American flag — proudly known as the Stars and Stripes — is more than a banner of colors stitched together. It is a living symbol of rebellion, unity, and the sovereignty of the people. It was never originally the flag of a government, but of a movement; not a mark of officialdom, but of revolution.  Having evolved from the Continental Union Flag, its stripes — with their roots in the "rebellious stripes" of the Sons of Liberty — represent resistance to abusive power, a stand against imperial overreach, and a declaration that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed. In this light, the proliferation of the “Thin Blue Line” version of the American flag is not merely a modification of a unique American symbol; it is a mutilation of the flag’s fabric and its meaning. It transforms a people’s flag into a government’s flag, in direct contradiction to its foundational ethos. The Stars and Stripes emerged during the crucible of the American Revolution. Designe...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...