Skip to main content

The Truth About Immigration Enforcement

In Minneapolis, Minnesota, two recent shootings involving officers of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency have left two citizens dead. This has caused an uproar from those who don’t appreciate the simplicity of this issue, those who have their clever ways of getting around or ignoring these simple facts: those who enter or remain illegally within the borders of the United States are criminals and fugitives from justice. Those who interfere with or obstruct any lawful investigation or lawful apprehension of such persons are also in violation of the law. Beyond this, any added complexity amounts to obfuscation, complexity for the sake of confounding the issues and confusing minds, reframing for purposes of virtue-signaling, fomenting outrage, or attempting to moralize and thereby draw people into the protests (whether as active participants or as contemptuous supporters). 


In almost every case, however, it is a person distracted or hypnotized by the narrative, away from the simple facts and objective truths which otherwise make this a rather non-political, cut and dry, and far less interesting situation. Ironically, far from the intentions of the many protesting in the streets and obstructing justice, they have succeeded primarily in demonstrating just how important it is to have a force capable enough to bring illegal immigrants — unwelcome invaders — to justice. Unfortunately for those rightly wary of ceding any more authority than necessary to government, these protestors and obstructors are aiding in building the case for ever more power to the state. In this case, because of this and the failure of the state to keep these criminals out of the country, and because of the many government programs and incentives serving immigrants (regardless of their legal status), the force necessary to resolve the issue finds its justifications in both the failure of government (at all levels) and the non-sensical protests, obstructions, and interference encountered in the process of finally bringing these criminals to justice; and holding them accountable has become an even more difficult task because the nonsensical protestors and obstructors view the criminals as worthy of protection because America has been generous or lazy enough to delay in taking action, thereby enabling them to stay far longer than they have been welcome, if they were ever welcome at all. 


Ultimately, the ongoing protests, riots, and acts of aggression against ICE officers across major cities have brought attention to an issue that many seem to misunderstand or to complicate unnecessarily. In reality, the job of ICE is not just a job, but a vital function in maintaining the integrity of the immigration system. The individuals who have entered or remain illegally in the United States are criminals. They must be brought to justice through the courts, just like any other criminal in the country. No country (and no culture) can survive where it fails to protect its borders. Without the enforcement of laws that preserve the system’s integrity, the entire structure collapses. ICE officers are performing a critical service — apprehending individuals who break those laws — and that must be understood as a foundational duty to the country.


However, this fundamental duty is often obscured by the actions of protestors and rioters who choose to obstruct the very process that is meant to protect the country's security and uphold its laws. The protests and the riots against ICE have absolutely no substance. The job of ICE is clear: deport illegal immigrants. They have the lawful authority to do so, and they are merely enforcing the lawsthat preserve the integrity of the immigration system. The people who interfere physically with ICE — whether through protests, obstruction, or aggression — are adding complexity where it is completely unnecessary


If protestors truly believed in meaningful change, they would appeal to their representatives or take their concerns through the proper legal channels — the courts, the legislature, or civil discourse. But they don’t. Instead, their preferred method of engaging in these issues is through force and violence, which only serves to create more chaos and division. This approach does nothing to bring about real change and only distracts from the lawfulness and order that the immigration system (and any political system) requires.


In this climate, it is also important to highlight the lack of compassion for the American citizens who are struggling. The focus of these protests is often on illegal immigrants, but what about the addicts, the homeless, the veterans, and the victims of illegal immigrants — those Americans who have spent years, or (with their ancestors) even generations, building the systems and the very country that these protests threaten to undermine? These individuals are often neglected or left out of the conversation, even though they have gone about their lives through hard work and honest living, and as law-abiding citizens. They are the ones paying taxes, contributing to society, and trying to make their lives and others’ better, yet they are pushed aside in favor of people who are breaking the law and aren’t even Americans. Not only are they not Americans, but they often denigrate America and its citizens, and they clearly have no respect for its laws, its people, its culture, or its institutionsWhether for a lack of care or concern, or for the inability of these malcontents to consider alternatives, the unseen, or the bigger picture, from them there is no compassion for the people who are suffering, working, and building that which we call ‘America’; they have no concern or compassion for the sacrifice of Americans, not just in labor and capital but in the form of the lives lost in building and defending this country. 


What compounds this issue is the moralizing and virtue-signaling from those who protest. These individuals often act as though they are standing up for justice, compassion, and righteousness, but when their commitment is tested — especially in cases where their opponents’ have no malicious intent — they act harshly and without understanding. The real problem here is that the protestors are more interested in appearing righteous than in engaging with the cold, hard facts, the simple facts of the matter, or (in other cases) the complexities of issues they don’t understand. With the violence, the doxxing, and the aggression, these are together their modus operandi, their manner of being: act first and (maybe) think later


By all appearances, they are more focused on the act of virtue-signaling than on achieving any meaningful, lawful resolutions. This approach is neither productive nor helpful, and it often results in outcomes harmful to the very causes they claim to champion.


The issue here is not complex — that is where so much of the confusion lies. The reality is rather simple: criminals must be apprehended and brought to justice through the legal system. Any interference with that process, whether it’s by protestors obstructing ICE’s work or anyone else causing distractions, presents an unnecessary complication. The perception of complexity comes from the sheer volume of contradictory information to which people are exposed. All of this creates a false impression of nuance, but at its core, this is a clear-cut issue: If you break the law, you face the consequences. Those who willfully try to obstruct the law enforcement process are not just getting in the way of justice; they are undermining the country of their fathers and grandfathers, they are defiling the integrity of their country, they are distorting the concept of justice, and they are adding layers of complexity that are completely unnecessary. They aren’t aiding in the process of justice; they are obstructing it.


In conclusion, the issue is rather straightforwardCriminals must face the consequences of their actions according to the law. Any protest, riot, or action that interferes with that process is just adding layers of complexity for the sake of some personal crusade, some sense of personal inadequacy, or some incoherent political agenda; in any case, those obstructing, doxxing, interfering with, or aggressing against ICE are not contributing to meaningful solutions. The focus must be on prioritizing the needs of American citizens, those who are often ignored in favor of others credited as ‘victims’. The protestors and rioters are more interested in virtue-signaling and moralizing than they are in actually engaging in the lawful, meaningful processes that protect the country and ensure a functioning system for Americans and America’s future. As such, they are failing to address the core issues and instead creating a distraction from the work that needs to be done: in this case, the apprehension of known criminals within America’s borders.


The good and thoughtful people aren’t out there bringing violence to the streets and doxxing men in uniform doing a service to their country. But those noisy malcontents make the headlines as good and wise people stay out of the fray and focus on their families and truly understanding the issues. After all, a true understanding of the issues keeps people off the streets and away from the types of people who act first and maybe get around to thinking later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The People's Banner: Why the “Thin Blue Line” Flag Betrays the Spirit of the Stars and Stripes

The American flag — proudly known as the Stars and Stripes — is more than a banner of colors stitched together. It is a living symbol of rebellion, unity, and the sovereignty of the people. It was never originally the flag of a government, but of a movement; not a mark of officialdom, but of revolution.  Having evolved from the Continental Union Flag, its stripes — with their roots in the "rebellious stripes" of the Sons of Liberty — represent resistance to abusive power, a stand against imperial overreach, and a declaration that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed. In this light, the proliferation of the “Thin Blue Line” version of the American flag is not merely a modification of a unique American symbol; it is a mutilation of the flag’s fabric and its meaning. It transforms a people’s flag into a government’s flag, in direct contradiction to its foundational ethos. The Stars and Stripes emerged during the crucible of the American Revolution. Designe...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...