Skip to main content

Church Over Christ

The true “believer” is revealed by the consistency between his beliefs and his behavior. If someone truly believes that eternal destinies are at stake — that heaven and hell are real, that the consequences are everlasting, and that salvation depends upon faith or works — then the stakes are not merely high but infinite: infinite in degree and in scope, with the effects propagating into the future as humanity continues generation after generation. The number of souls at risk is not just in the billions today but expands indefinitely into the future. If that framework is taken seriously, then the rational response would seem to be an overwhelming sense urgency by those who claim to appreciate the stakes. Everything else — career, comfort, reputation, leisure — would become secondary to the singular task of “saving” as many people as possible. Yet, despite the billions who claim to be Christian — or who claim to believe in any God — there are precious few who make this their life’s purpose. 


This is not primarily a question about denomination or theology. At its core, it is about belief itself. If one affirms that eternal joy or eternal loss hinges on whether people accept a particular message, then ordinary religious life appears inconsistent with the responsibilities inherited as a “believer”. A belief in infinite consequences should be followed by unmistakable action. If it is not, then either the belief is not held with conviction or the believer has vacated his inherited responsibilities. The tension lies not in the doctrine’s complexity but in the apparent gap between its significance and its lived expression.


What most people encounter in contemporary Christianity is not relentless, all-consuming urgency. It is structured and institutional, a matter of routine: church attendance, social life, occasional Bible study and charitable activities. This suggests a distinction between what might be called Biblical Christianity and what could be described as “Church-ianity”. The former, as presented in the New Testament, reads as radical, sacrificial, and mission-centered. The latter appears moderated, domesticated, and woven into ordinary life. From this perspective, the absence of frantic evangelistic intensity is not puzzling. It is evidence that, over time, institutional religion has tamed (or toned down) a message that, if taken at full force, would be existentially disruptive, and might chase away status-driven congregants who enjoy the social aspects of church and community, but who aren’t interested in the risks or tests that come along with being true and faithful believers.


The argument, then, is not merely a critique of individuals. It is an observation about systems. If infinite stakes are truly believed, maximal urgency would be expected. The fact that this urgency is largely nonexistent among “believers” suggests that the lived form of the religion has shifted from its original radical edge into something more focused on status or long-term social continuity. Or perhaps it simply goes to show that most “believers” don’t really believe. Whether that shift is a necessary evolution or a fundamental departure from the Word is the deeper question, but it is clear that the institutions leading the “believers” have, over centuries, seen the size of their congregations swell at the same time that their intensity and sense of urgency have essentially vanished. 


What is most striking and undeniable, however, is that true believers — the ones who truly believe in heaven and hell, eternal salvation and eternal damnation — have only one option in life: scramble to “save” as many as they can. Those who fail to even get started along these lines, those who prioritize comfort, convenience, expedience or indulgence, can (in their professed “belief”) only be lying or selfish. For, if they truly believe, their actions would follow, and where they “believe” and yet take little action to “save” others, they are failing to alert their fellow man (potentially deaf and standing on the tracks) of the train that is fast approaching. The truth of the matter is this: with such a belief, there is likely nothing (other than incapacitation) that could keep the true believer from making this his life’s purpose. 


Just imagine having uncovered the greatest treasure map in all the world. And imagine believing in it completely. There is, in such a case, nothing that could keep a person from doing everything in his power to get to the treasure, or to alert the public of the map’s existence. Given the fact that precious few of the billions of professed Christians around the world ever take it upon themselves to spread the Word with urgency or to plead with people for their time and willing ears, it is clear just what kinds of “Christians” they are. 


Put another way, they aren’t Christians at all. These billions have more than a mere treasure map; they have the claimed Word of God Himself. However, almost all of them would be more thrilled to have the treasure map than the Word of God, and one thing’s for certain: they’d sure be motivated to take action with the treasure map in their hands. Between the treasure map and the claimed Word of God, it appears that they have at least one thing in common: above all, both are generally used as means to gains in wealth and status. Perhaps that is all that they really are. 


Author’s Note


Despite numbering in the billions worldwide, modern Christians manage to achieve very little in the realms of moral instruction, defense, and progress. 


Whereas it has its basis in a history of conflict and often harsh judgment, it is a feel-good religion in its modern iteration. 


In this capacity, modern Christianity is worse than useless — it often gets in the way of true Christianity and people who are serious about wisdom and universal ethics. 


Seldom do you ever see Christians banding together against injustice, even in its most conspicuous forms. They would rather maintain appearances of civility and avoid dealing with such emotions as anger, hatred, and frustration; emotions rooted out of the modern Christian, as if those emotions are themselves signs of the devil rather than our God-given and time-tested impulses to defend that which is good, right, true, and just. 


Avoiding those emotions makes cowards out of men, just as it does to sin in silence where good people are all that stand between bad people and their ends. After all, the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. 


This is, perhaps, the one capacity in which modern Christians have proved exemplary: making a show of their righteous morality while staking, risking, and doing virtually nothing to spread practical wisdom or root out evil. 


The feel-good religion is good business, and for the modern Christian, there is nothing better than good feelings and good business — nothing better than the donations going to the institutions and the donuts offered to the congregation as their reward for showing up to mass, checking the box, and maintaining appearances. It’s a win-win: tax-free donations to the institutions and the unbeatable feeling of moral superiority for the congregants; all at the small price of waking up early on Sunday morning and pitching in a few bucks when the collection plate is passed around. 


Ultimately, Scripture informs us that the physical church and its figureheads are superfluous to man's bare worship and glorification of God in spirit and truth. As it is written in the Book of John (John 4:21, 23): "Woman, believe me, the hour is coming when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father... But the hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father is seeking such people to worship him."


With these words, Jesus proclaimed that worship would no longer be centered on a particular sacred location and that access to God would not depend upon physical presence at a temple. According to Jesus, true worship is based upon an individual's personal relationship with God through the Spirit and grounded in truth.


This anticipated the New Covenant, wherein God's presence would dwell with and within His people rather than being associated primarily with a building.


This theme appears elsewhere in the New Testament. For example, Paul the Apostle wrote that believers themselves are God's temple (1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19), and the Book of Revelation describes the future kingdom in which there is no temple because God's presence fills all things (Revelation 21:22).

Finally, with the advent of the printing press and the widespread translation and dissemination of the Bible, the Word has become accessible to all who seek it—all who seek to worship God, cultivate a relationship with Him, and glorify Him in spirit and truth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...

Taxation Without Representation

During the American Revolution, one of the most popular rallying cries was “No taxation without representation!” This came at a time when the American colonists were being subjected to progressively higher taxes — imposed on progressively greater numbers of goods — levied by the Crown with the assurance that the colonists enjoyed “virtual representation”. Of course, this “virtual representation” was no representation at all, as the “virtual representative” was not elected by the colonists nor disposed to their grievances.  Well, there are those among us who fail to recognize (or to admit) the parallels present in the modern day, where taxes on Americans are not just unfathomably higher than when the colonists decried the injustice; they are just part of the total cost imposed upon a people not present in the negotiations nor properly represented in the government which claims to have resolved the problems of the past. A recent YouTube comment illustrates the misconception: “ T...