Skip to main content

Institutional Racism: The Sasquatch of Political Folklore

A great confusion has arisen out of the clamor of political debate, one which presupposes that any dismissal of the merits of “institutional racism” somehow equates to one’s rejection of personal struggle. 

Whereas the struggle of any individual remains always and everywhere unique and wholly personal, his common bond of complexion with others who have struggled serves inadequately as the basis for any argument which regards this commonality as the cause, or as the reason, for that veritable struggle. 

To condemn the unidentifiable and nebulous abstraction, then, by castigating an unnamed institution which persists beyond our specific capacity to recognize its power, serves only to absolve individuals of their personal responsibility, to shift blame and culpability to a specter which exists only by the creative designs of our imaginations, which exists as the scapegoat for all outcomes popularly maligned as undesirable. 

This unactionable practice, then, swiftly and categorically excuses every individual for failings which all along remained precisely within their control, serving only to distract them from the changes they could reasonably effect to modify their lives and their welfare. 

In fact, a 2013 Brookings Institution study found that 98 percent of American adults who followed these three simple rules were living free of poverty: finish high school, get a full-time job and wait until age 21 to get married and have children. The study illustrates that there is clearly no evidence of ubiquitous or institutional racism causing this outcome, as it is rather domestic culture and poor decision-making which is apparently responsible for producing lives mired in long-term poverty.

Instead of confronting these matters or assuming personal responsibility over them, however, it has become far easier and far more fashionable to unify with the many others who’ve academically concocted, or otherwise robotically parroted, a digestible or superficially-relatable excuse for their struggle in a world which is plainly rife with purely distinct forms of it. 

As an infant who shouts into the ether without a coherent message to convey, so too have so many adult-looking persons persisted to engage in this behavior, qualifying their qualms merely on the basis of being backed by people who appear wiser or adult-like, whose chants appear to resemble the ones which are ostensibly certified by history texts, but who manifestly lack the cogency to elucidate a clear-minded point beyond the face value of the anger, frustration and insecurity which surrounds their admittedly-disappointing lives. 

It appears, at last, that the archetypical hero is no longer one who takes the initiative to improve his own life by the merits of his own enterprise and tireless work ethic, but instead this model has devolved into one celebrated for the unrelenting hot air and angry tones he emits from his mouth, the unthinking rallying cries he engenders through his unwitting disciples, and the despicable opponent he’s cast upon the wall of Plato’s cave. 

It is just too bad that so few will conduct the requisite due diligence to expose the fraud, and of those who do, few will actually have the audacity to disclose the truth, for fear of insulting the angry mob, while those who do are systematically relegated to the rank of racist, bigot or Republican, the modern equivalent to Hawthorne’s scarlet letter.

When one actually endeavors into the jarring and lonely abyss of truth, he is invariably confronted with a uniquely distinct tale of statistics which paint an entirely different portrait from the one popularly broadcast through mainstream media, over the airwaves and through social media.

For those up to the task, continue reading.

Of the 2,699 police killings between 2013 and 2015, white suspects constituted fully 45 percent of them. 

According to the same exhaustive study by the Crime Prevention Research Center, black police officers are statistically more likely than white police officers to kill black suspects. 

What’s more, research by the FBI shows that 90.1 percent of black victims of homicide were killed by other blacks. 

According to the Department of Justice, of the 75 largest counties in the United States, blacks constitute 15 percent of the population while accounting for 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults. 

In New York City, blacks account for 23 percent of the population while committing 75 percent of all shootings. 

By contrast, whites constitute 34 percent of the population while accounting for only 2 percent of shootings. 

According to the Census Bureau, fully three-quarters of all black youths in the United States are growing up in broken single-parent households. 

None of these outcomes shouts of racism, much less its largely-imagined institutional variety, but rather of poor personal decision-making. 

As it turns out, "institutional racism” serves merely as a masking agent for individuals’ reluctance to assume responsibility for their respective stations in life, or rather their incapacity to recognize the artificial hurdles they’ve effectively placed in their own way.

Oddly enough, the bulk of the evidence reveals an alternative semblance of institutional racism, but not likely where you thought it would originate: government, in the very apparatuses ironically embraced by the people whom it has apparently harmed the most.

I cover this subject in further detail in another article: The Vicious Vortex of Palatably Promoting Poverty.  


  1. "In fact, a 2013 Brookings Institution study found that 98 percent of American adults who followed these three simple rules were living free of poverty: finish high school, get a full-time job and wait until age 21 to get married and have children. The study illustrates that there is clearly no evidence of ubiquitous or institutional racism causing this outcome, as it is rather domestic culture and poor decision-making which is apparently responsible for producing lives mired in long-term poverty."

    For one, correlation does not imply causation, all that study says is that 98 percent of Americans which follow those "3 simple rules" do will not live in poverty. This doesn't mean that simply going around and telling people to not get married before they're 21 is the silver bullet which will end poverty.

    Furthermore, you assert that this "poor decision-making" is what is responsible for poverty. This is technically true; however, if we go one level deeper this subject becomes significantly more interesting.

    Why do these people make worse decisions? Unless you wish to go the race realist route of saying that black people are just genetically inferior, you have to offer up a reasonable answer to this question.

    I propose that many factors, such as Redlining[1] and Lead Paint[2], are still having a lasting impact today. This goes back to something deeper: poor people don't magically become rich, rich people don't magically become poor[3]. With this knowledge taken into account, we can now consider that these policies enacted decades ago can be having a lasting impact on a select subset of the population.

    So, now we're left with the philosophical question: does a society which previously mistreated a group have the moral imperative to give them a "helping hand" to catch up?



Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Goldmoney: Real Money Purposed for the Future

The institution of money entered the minds of sophisticated traders several millennia ago, when instead of bartering with limited numbers of people within the cumbersome double coincidence of wants, large-scale economies developed from the reach and transparency of commodity money which was scarce, durable, fungible, transportable, divisible, recognizable, and usable in and of itself. 

While we may appear to have transcended those primitive times and those so-called barbarous relics, the truth is that we have merely mutilated the concept of money by clandestinely replacing it with its more manipulable and abstract representative, the proverbial coat check without the coat. 

This is but the device of a large-scale social experiment run in real time, and we are its unwitting and unconsenting subjects who’ve largely never heard of the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate, much less its missions of “maximum employment” and 2-percent annual inflation.

Yet there is hope after all.

Finally, after deca…

The Kaepernick Craze: Exposing the Nation's Fools One Conversation at a Time

The Kaeparnick craze and other viral movements haven't merely pressured people into becoming simpler caricatures of their prior selves, but they have manifestly exposed people for how foolish and uninformed they've been all along. 

In his final year in the NFL, Kaepernick ranked 17th in passer rating and 34th the year before that. 

He played through an entire season in only two of his six years in the league, and his best full-season performance ranks far outside of the NFL's top-250 single-season passing performances in the league's history. 

For reference, the oft-criticized Tony Romo posted a career passer rating of 97.1, as compared to Kaepernick's 88.9. 

Romo's passer rating dipped below 90 for only one season of the eleven seasons he played, whereas Kaepernick failed to eclipse the 90 mark on three of his six seasons, a full 50 percent of his time in the NFL. 

In fact, Kaepernick accomplished this feat only once if we are to discard those other two seasons in …

Leftists Hate Guns Because They Hate Liberty

The vast majority of Americans hardly know what exactly happened in Florida, let alone the reasons for it.

They have no idea whether any sort of policy would have prevented it, and instead of pursuing knowledge and investigating for themselves, they ubiquitously lean on the journalistic biases of those who have become intimately acquainted with hyperbole and sensational reporting absent cogent comprehension of the actual events.

All they know, especially those of the Left, is that a version of nirvana, which exists purely in their respective minds, enables them to consider restrictions on gun ownership as a viable means to rectification of a problem which they have, once again, only ambiguously identified.

They widely pay no mind to costs, even should their agendas yield a complete exhaustion of liberty, as they are plainly and steadfastly concentrated on their game of political whack-a-mole, legislating a perceived solution to every observable problem without any appreciation for the im…