Skip to main content

Don't Be Fooled By Record-Low Mortgage Rates

The US economy has officially entered recession, and the record lows among interest rates are not merely symptomatic of the Federal Reserve’s response to recession, but they have all the while presaged recession in their very inception of their zero interest-rate policy. 

Those record-low mortgage rates will be available to only a select segment of prospective home buyers, who suddenly face tightening lending standards as banks acknowledge the inherent downside risk of collateral, and the elevated risk of default, in shaky job and housing markets. 

While tightening lending standards may lead the eligible few to feel special in qualifying, that feeling, if unaccompanied by a strict financial plan, will predictably fade as soon as they realize what they've become.

The record-low interest rates permeating the market represent the efforts of the Federal Reserve to induce spending to buoy asset prices in order to sustain the illusion of a viable debt-financed economy. 

Meanwhile, rates for refinancing, where available, serve the interests of a narrow segment of existing homeowners, who possess the acumen to properly invest the cash to not only protect against loss, but to preserve their purchasing power. 

Prospective home buyers, on the other hand, risk buying a depreciating asset, in real terms, while ignoring the investment opportunity cost and the risk of sudden job loss which can unexpectedly force an untimely home sale at a probable loss. 

And these risks are currently enormous. 

We must remember that home prices are a function of rents, and at a time when rents are being deferred by government mandate, where they are likely to be forgiven altogether in the same fashion, there is little substance to any rally in the real estate prices they support.

Those seeking liquidity for speculation are well-served to acknowledge the risks, not only of financial loss but of mounting interest obligations exceeding one’s ability to repay. 

Meanwhile, those entertaining the idea of refinancing without an investment plan, or that of purchasing a home, must acknowledge the new relationship between their assets and liabilities.

If refinancing a home and holding cash, one exposes himself to the downside risks of monetary inflation; if purchasing a home, he risks becoming the unenviable bag holder with an undesirable asset depreciating in (real) value. 

Therefore, while low interest rates can occasionally signal a promising buying opportunity, particularly as an early beneficiary, where cheap credit enables buyers to gobble up assets with capital borrowed against future earnings, they have to first ask themselves whether they are concerned primarily with the price of the home or the price of the capital. 

Wherever interest rates have long been suppressed, one will find prices representative of the participation they have artificially induced. 

Thus, where one finds an environment of cheap credit enabling mass participation, he’ll find a price commensurate with the volume of bids facilitated by those terms. 

With a price long reflective of bullish and speculative sentiment, at the behest of induced democratic participation, you’ll find latecomers buying out the untenable positions of speculators and unwitting risk-takers alike. 

They will be seduced by the price of capital after unquestioningly accepting the present and expected future price of the currently-overpriced liability; they are sold the asset, the house and the dream it represents, upon failing to understand the liability, the mortgage that they may be unable to repay or sell.

Ultimately, most people want to spend less for the things they buy, not merely less on the means by which they finance the purchase. 

With interest rates at record-low levels for the past two decades, homeowners and speculators alike have been rewarded with real estate appreciation and the lines of credit thereby made available for further speculation and investment. 




They’ve been spoiled with an ever-increasing pool of bidders who’ve gained entry to a market flush with cash and cheap credit, who’d happily accept the mortgage on their unexamined assumptions that home prices would continue to rise and that there would always be a greater fool willing to buy and assume their liability. 

Unfortunately, once the cost of capital normalizes and sentiment suddenly shifts, there will be no greater fool and no one left to buy the bag. 

The homeowner will be left staring inside, wondering what in the world he had done; he will be left to finally acknowledge that he had been conned. 

With that being said, the announcement of record-low mortgage rates isn’t nearly the cause for celebration that some may believe, unless you’re one of the lucky few to sell to an unlucky buyer who fails to understand why.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

The Keynesian mantra, in its implications, has its roots in destruction rather than truth: “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your guiding principle, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. While it is true that our fates intersect in death, that does not mean that we ought to condemn our heirs to that view: the view that our work on this planet ought only to serve ourselves, and that we ought only to bear in mind the consequences within our own lifetimes.  The Keynesians, of course, prefer their outlook, as it serves their interests; it has the further benefit of appealing to other selfish people who have little interest in the future to which they'll ultimately condemn their heirs. After all, they'll be long gone by then. So, in the Keynesian view, the longterm prospects for the common currency, social stability, and personal liberty are not just irrelevant but inconvenient. In their view, regardless of the consequences, those in charge tod

There's Always Another Tax: The Tragedy of the Public Park

In the San Francisco Bay Area, many residents work tirelessly throughout the year to pay tens of thousands of dollars in annual property taxes. In addition to this, they are charged an extra 10 percent on all expenses through local sales taxes. It doesn't stop there. In addition to their massive federal tax bill, the busy state of California capitalizes on the opportunity to seize another 10 percent through their own sizable state income taxes. But guess what! It doesn't stop there. No, no, no, no.  In California, there's always another tax. After all of these taxes, which have all the while been reported to cover every nook and cranny of the utopian vision, the Bay Area resident is left to face yet an additional tax at the grocery store, this time on soda. The visionaries within government, and those who champion its warmhearted intentions, label this one the "soda tax," which unbelievably includes Gatorade, the preferred beverage of athletes

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. It was a war whose total cost, including pensions and the burial of veterans, was an estimated $12 billion. Likewise, it was a war that would