Skip to main content

Don't Be Fooled By Record-Low Mortgage Rates

The US economy has officially entered recession, and the record lows among interest rates are not merely symptomatic of the Federal Reserve’s response to recession, but they have all the while presaged recession in their very inception of their zero interest-rate policy. 

Those record-low mortgage rates will be available to only a select segment of prospective home buyers, who suddenly face tightening lending standards as banks acknowledge the inherent downside risk of collateral, and the elevated risk of default, in shaky job and housing markets. 

While tightening lending standards may lead the eligible few to feel special in qualifying, that feeling, if unaccompanied by a strict financial plan, will predictably fade as soon as they realize what they've become.

The record-low interest rates permeating the market represent the efforts of the Federal Reserve to induce spending to buoy asset prices in order to sustain the illusion of a viable debt-financed economy. 

Meanwhile, rates for refinancing, where available, serve the interests of a narrow segment of existing homeowners, who possess the acumen to properly invest the cash to not only protect against loss, but to preserve their purchasing power. 

Prospective home buyers, on the other hand, risk buying a depreciating asset, in real terms, while ignoring the investment opportunity cost and the risk of sudden job loss which can unexpectedly force an untimely home sale at a probable loss. 

And these risks are currently enormous. 

We must remember that home prices are a function of rents, and at a time when rents are being deferred by government mandate, where they are likely to be forgiven altogether in the same fashion, there is little substance to any rally in the real estate prices they support.

Those seeking liquidity for speculation are well-served to acknowledge the risks, not only of financial loss but of mounting interest obligations exceeding one’s ability to repay. 

Meanwhile, those entertaining the idea of refinancing without an investment plan, or that of purchasing a home, must acknowledge the new relationship between their assets and liabilities.

If refinancing a home and holding cash, one exposes himself to the downside risks of monetary inflation; if purchasing a home, he risks becoming the unenviable bag holder with an undesirable asset depreciating in (real) value. 

Therefore, while low interest rates can occasionally signal a promising buying opportunity, particularly as an early beneficiary, where cheap credit enables buyers to gobble up assets with capital borrowed against future earnings, they have to first ask themselves whether they are concerned primarily with the price of the home or the price of the capital. 

Wherever interest rates have long been suppressed, one will find prices representative of the participation they have artificially induced. 

Thus, where one finds an environment of cheap credit enabling mass participation, he’ll find a price commensurate with the volume of bids facilitated by those terms. 

With a price long reflective of bullish and speculative sentiment, at the behest of induced democratic participation, you’ll find latecomers buying out the untenable positions of speculators and unwitting risk-takers alike. 

They will be seduced by the price of capital after unquestioningly accepting the present and expected future price of the currently-overpriced liability; they are sold the asset, the house and the dream it represents, upon failing to understand the liability, the mortgage that they may be unable to repay or sell.

Ultimately, most people want to spend less for the things they buy, not merely less on the means by which they finance the purchase. 

With interest rates at record-low levels for the past two decades, homeowners and speculators alike have been rewarded with real estate appreciation and the lines of credit thereby made available for further speculation and investment. 




They’ve been spoiled with an ever-increasing pool of bidders who’ve gained entry to a market flush with cash and cheap credit, who’d happily accept the mortgage on their unexamined assumptions that home prices would continue to rise and that there would always be a greater fool willing to buy and assume their liability. 

Unfortunately, once the cost of capital normalizes and sentiment suddenly shifts, there will be no greater fool and no one left to buy the bag. 

The homeowner will be left staring inside, wondering what in the world he had done; he will be left to finally acknowledge that he had been conned. 

With that being said, the announcement of record-low mortgage rates isn’t nearly the cause for celebration that some may believe, unless you’re one of the lucky few to sell to an unlucky buyer who fails to understand why.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...