Skip to main content

The People's Banner: Why the “Thin Blue Line” Flag Betrays the Spirit of the Stars and Stripes

The American flag — proudly known as the Stars and Stripes — is more than a banner of colors stitched together. It is a living symbol of rebellion, unity, and the sovereignty of the people. It was never originally the flag of a government, but of a movement; not a mark of officialdom, but of revolution. 

Having evolved from the Continental Union Flag, its stripes — with their roots in the "rebellious stripes" of the Sons of Liberty — represent resistance to abusive power, a stand against imperial overreach, and a declaration that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed. In this light, the proliferation of the “Thin Blue Line” version of the American flag is not merely a modification of a unique American symbol; it is a mutilation of the flag’s fabric and its meaning. It transforms a people’s flag into a government’s flag, in direct contradiction to its foundational ethos.

The Stars and Stripes emerged during the crucible of the American Revolution. Designed amid a bloody struggle for independence, it represented the collective identity of thirteen colonies rising up against one of the most powerful empires in history. The original flag was not created by a centralized government — such a government did not yet exist, as America (as we know it) was then a collection of colonies (and after the Revolutionary War a collection of sovereign, independent states). Instead, it was adopted by the people, by militias and rebels, by a population seeking liberty and self-determination. The flag signaled not only unity, but defiance. It did not mark a loyalist institution; it flew over encampments of dissenters, over ships that defied royal decrees, and on the battlefields where ordinary citizens staked their lives against authoritarian control.

Its thirteen stripes were not decorative — they were declarations. Each one symbolized a rebellious colony, a place where people had thrown off the chains of monarchy in favor of sovereignty and self-governance. These were rebellious stripes in the most literal sense.


Symbols like the flag derive power from their universality and the principles they are understood to represent. The American flag, when flown in its proper form, represents a nation of laws, a land of liberties and rights defended by man but inherited from God, and the primacy of the people over the state. It is not merely a symbol of bureaucratic jurisdiction or a political claim to territory — it is a promise of principles.


That is why the “Thin Blue Line” version of the flag strikes such a discordant note. Rendered in black and white with a single blue stripe replacing one of the original red ones, this variation is often presented as a tribute to law enforcement. But in doing so, it makes several grave symbolic missteps. First, it appropriates and alters a shared American symbol for a narrow institutional allegiance. Second, it exalts an arm of the state — the police — over the population it is meant to serve. Third, it introduces a political undercurrent that conflicts with the flag’s historical roots in civil resistance and anti-authoritarianism.


The adoption of the “Thin Blue Line” flag has not occurred in a vacuum. It has often been wielded in opposition to movements criticizing police violence or advocating for systemic reform — movements that, ironically, resemble the spirit of protest and accountability that gave rise to the American flag in the first place. To fly the “Thin Blue Line” flag is not just to honor police — it is, in many contexts, a political statement that elevates state force above civilian scrutiny and betrays the very meaning of the Stars and Stripes.


Where the original flag stood for a people rising up against oppressive authority, the “Thin Blue Line” flag often functions as a defense of authority against popular protest — a defense of the kind of authority that systematically encroaches upon the principles articulated in America’s founding documents and represented by the Stars and Stripes. This inversion should trouble anyone who values the spirit of revolution and liberty on which the United States were founded. It changes the flag from a people's standard into a state emblem. It thereby ceases to be a symbol of all Americans and righteous disobedience, to instead become a banner of thoughtless obedience and allegiance to a specific government institution — and an abusive one at that.


True patriotism involves not a charitable submission to authority but a critical love of country — the kind that seeks to protect liberty by holding power to account. Blind reverence for institutions, especially those with the authority to use force, can easily slip into idolatry. The Founders understood this. They feared standing armies, unchecked executive power, and unaccountable police forces. That’s why the Constitution and the Bill of Rights exist — to restrain government, not to sanctify it. 


When the American flag is altered to exalt state power, it loses its soul. It no longer reminds us of our right to dissent, our duty to speak out, and our heritage as rebels against tyranny. Instead, it becomes a badge of conformity, submission, and misplaced loyalty.


The Stars and Stripes must not be surrendered to any one ideology, party, or profession — least of all to an arm of state enforcement. It belongs to the people. It was never meant to be a symbol of the government, but a reminder of the source of true power in a land of freedom and bravery: the citizen.


To fly the flag in its true form is to honor the rebellious spirit that birthed a country of liberty and God-given rights. To alter it in ways that exalt state power over the people is not just a misuse of symbolism; it is a betrayal of the very principles the flag was meant to represent.


Let us remember that the American flag, in its original and unaltered form, flies not just because the wind moves it. It flies for the movements of every person who dares to stand, speak, and demand justice. It is not the flag of authority. It is the flag of resistance, the flag of our fathers, and it is ours; and it is the flag of our future if we keep it the way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Victorious in 2024 Presidential Election

As of this hour, former President and now President-elect Donald Trump has secured his second term as the forty-seventh President of the United States. Trump’s victory comes after winning key battleground states Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.  As for the popular vote, Trump was victorious there as well, winning by a one-and-a-half-percent margin. Despite these results, it’s evident that there remains a significant social and political problem in the United States, where politically-motivated violence, social unrest, crime and general instability have become rampant over the years since the death of George Floyd.  However, I’d say the fact that it was even this close is ominous for the years ahead. This was as clear as it gets for an election, that the incumbents (both Biden and Harris) are wholly unfit for any office, that they present a real and present danger where they’re allowed within twelve thousand miles of a school zone, let alone any...

From BC to AD to AI

Artificial intelligence is bound not only to render the ordinary human being boring by comparison, and in many cases practically unnecessary, but to dispose human beings to hostility toward each other where any dares pose a question or raise a concern instead of taking it up with a chatbot (or AI interface); such a course of action eventually assuming such a regular place in human affairs as to stand in entirely for human discourse and daily interaction.  This is not only a very real possibility when considering the future course of human ‘civilization’; it is more than likely imminent or already upon us.  It is left to be seen just what this will look like, just how this will play out, just what tolerance the species (and even beyond) has for such extremes which this technology is to bring about. Likewise, it remains to be seen whether a heavily-indebted society facing never-ending and unavoidable taxes (i.e. taxes on property) can even be expected to retrain and retool for t...

Failure by Design

In the case for liberty, there is certainly some tolerance for error or failure, as it is generally suffered by the individual and not brought upon anyone by design . Wherever anyone seeks to empower government, however, one must be reasonably certain of the designs, the logic and the costs, and he must be equally honest about the unknowns as with the foreseeable consequences; after all, there is no margin for error where those designs are administered by the barrel of a gun.  One must necessarily remember that government is a monopoly on force and coercion, that force and coercion serve together as the modifying distinction between government and enterprise. It is a kind of force and coercion not by spirit or intention of written law but in accordance with the letter and understanding of the enforcers in their own time, in their own limited judgment and impaired conscience. As opposed to a state of liberty, where mistakes, failures and crimes are unavoidable in the face of human f...