Skip to main content

The Left Controls Everything, But Everything is Still Not Enough

The Left has the cities, the colleges and the universities, the K-12 public schools, the police departments and the military, and they have the ‘scientists’, the academics, and the financiers in their pockets; they have the bulk of publishers, movie makers, and media outlets, the political privileges and ‘affirmative actions’ enumerated for and enjoyed by those of their ‘protected’ class. They have the ‘justification’ of ‘social justice’ for acts of vandalism, theft, assault and murder, the claim of ‘tolerance’ where they cancel, harass and doxx. And yet, despite all of this, they claim that it’s not enough, that they’re under attack, and that they are doomed by ‘the right’. 

The truth is that what passes as ‘the right’ today is a fabricated fiction, a convenient enemy. The arc of history for Western society has, in its clear and definitive departure from classical liberalism, demonstrated a secular shift to the radical left, with ‘the right’ (in its true form) a distant memory for some, a foreign concept to most, or a man holed up in defense of the forgotten cause. 

The truth is that Leftism so dominates the political landscape that bigger and bigger government, along with further and further encroachments, is not just the trend but the general expectation. The truth is that Leftism is to politics what breathing is to humans: it continues without much thought, with only relatively minor concessions made along the way by members of the establishment in order to keep some semblance of order; to preserve some of the artifacts embedded in the national fabric; and to pacify the people who aren’t yet ready but who, over time, continue to yield to the gradual encroachments upon their lives, their liberties, and their quality of life. 

Among those who believe that they are ‘doomed’ by ‘the right’, they have been conned not just by popular reimaginings of the left-right paradigm, but by the narrow frames in which information is presented, and the narrow six-inch screens by which they formulate their conceptions of ‘life’ and ‘the world’ — all to the benefit of the state and the greater establishment at the expense of truth, liberty, and the individual. All at the expense of a real appreciation for the vast majesty of thought, beauty, and adventure that exists beyond the narrow confines of those six-inch screens.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...