Skip to main content

The Rhetoric of the Inhumane

A despicably insensitive comment is making its rounds on social media, so ignorant and disrespectful that I hesitate to even share it here. Let it stand here as still further evidence of the evils on display in Leftist echo chambers: “If Charlie Kirk were a first grader at school America would have moved on by now.”

Statistically speaking, more than one hundred and fifty thousand people died the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated: among those, at least 70 people were killed in Gaza by Israeli attacks, 35 died in Yemen due to Israeli bombings; 29 civilians died after Russian attacks around the Donetsk Oblast area, and Russian forces suffered 890 casualties, while Ukrainian military casualties also measured in the hundreds, all in the same twenty-four-hour period. 

Death is all around us. 

It is a constant, a sad reality of daily life and a consequence of lots of different forces and factors. 

As human beings, we mourn the losses in our own ways, some more publicly than others; and we typically mourn the losses of those who made an impact on our lives. Charlie Kirk is one such man who made an impact on the lives of millions, ours included. 

His influence touched people in various ways, spiritual and political, and based on the outpouring of tributes and testimonies about Charlie, and the changes people are just now beginning to make in their lives — the widespread spiritual and religious awakenings worldwide — his influence continues through his spirit which remains strong among us who care. 

In paying our respects to Charlie, we take nothing away from the untold suffering of the countless millions around the world who are also mourning their own losses. 

As parents and grandparents, aunts and uncles, we mourn the loss of all innocent life, especially children. 

While we may not have known any of the victims from the other senseless tragedies this past week around the country, and around the world, that does not mean that they aren’t mourned. 

The fact that we publicly pay our respects to a public figure does not take anything away from those losses. 

Importantly, however, when a person is mourning the loss of another, the humane response is not to refer to other tragedies, or to slip in statistics and rhetoric. The humane response is to offer sympathies, condolences, and thoughtful reflection. 

This goes without saying for most people, and it goes without saying for all who maintain their sense of humanity. 

Even where one disagrees with much of what a person believes, a life dedicated (with consistency and sincerity, so far as we can tell) to the pursuit of truth, the defense of free speech and open dialogue, and the encouragement of moral and spiritual growth, is one worthy of respect and celebration. In a time when people and institutions often avoid or shut down meaningful conversation, someone who fosters open exchange and challenges others to think deeply — especially around the controversial — plays a vital role in a healthy and truly progressive society, in aiding the exploration of both ideas and self. 

Moreover, where his influence inspires individuals to become better husbands, fathers, and human beings, to seek edification and moral clarity, as we have witnessed over the years and as we are witnessing today in spirit, then his legacy transcends politics and ideological divisions. This speaks to a deeper commitment to human flourishing, a pursuit that should unite, rather than divide, those who genuinely care about humanity and the future of civilization. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The Cost of Government is What It Spends, Not What It Taxes

The cost of government is the quantity it spends, not the quantity it taxes; that cost representing the financial burden imposed upon those who pay the taxes and all who transact within that economy or through its common currency. Likewise, governments can either take the people’s money through taxation or they can take the people’s purchasing power through money-printing (or the like).  Therefore, the argument against tax cuts requires further context to appreciate why tax cuts have failed and will continue to fail to deliver economic growth, especially where those tax cuts promote or serve excess indulgence and cheap speculation. In short, it’s not that tax cuts are inherently destructive, or that reducing the tax liability of the wealthiest in society “doesn’t work”; rather, the fact is that the public debt is so high that the country simply cannot afford those tax cuts without defaulting on its debts or — which is the same — covering them through inflation (i.e. money-printing,...