Skip to main content

The Distorted Disposition Toward Homeownership

Housing is traditionally an asset that retains its market value across time, unlike a car which proves to preserve hardly any of its original value over its lifetime of use. 

The reason that property is so valuable in the San Francisco Bay Area, for instance, where property values ubiquitously outstrip the values of the homes built on them, is not because the houses are so elegant, but principally because of downzoning and vertical restrictions on development, the sky-high levels of government-backed credit made available at ultra low rates of interest to buyers who foresee untenable rates of real returns or unmanageably expensive total costs of ownership. 

Throughout the 1960s, before the end of Bretton Woods and the fiat frenzy that resulted in the dollar losing two-thirds of its real value over the 1970s and even further bouts of massive inflation during the following decades, the median sales price of homes in the United States climbed by a tepid 5% per annum. Since 1971, this same metric shows roughly 15% growth per annum through Q1 of this year. 


This means that homes used to serve as a mere inflation hedge, again preserving the real value of their respective homeowners' original investment, assuming proper maintenance of the property over that term. 

Today, Americans are far more comfortable taking on long-term debts and higher loan-to-value ratios, even up to 125%, with little down and jobs based on record-low levels of profitability, while FHA and HUD kick in added emphasis by buoying the asset prices with even further credit advanced by the taxpayers, or through monetization, to bid up or formalize the price floors of these assets. 

Meanwhile, homebuyers aren’t necessarily planning to use the mortgage as the “death pledge” it was originally intended to serve. 

Instead, they perceive the investment as a guaranteed beat on the market, a highly liquid asset through reverse mortgages and HELOCs that make homeownership even more desirable than alternative investments that produce the actual capital that really enables the expansion of the supply of goods and can therefore serve as true income-generating assets. 

So in this sense, homeownership is not purely an investment but a liability in the sense that it costs money and resources to maintain it. Government has irrevocably altered the general consensus on this market by making it so easy to finance and therefore so simple to offload to a greater fool at that later date. 

With the requisite rise of interest rates, the eventual budget cuts to FHA and HUD and the stark realization of uninsured accounts, credit will surely contract in the real estate and mortgage markets, and the existing mortgages will be secured by assets of diminishing value, yielding tighter lending standards that are balanced against the true time value of money and the inherent risk of default, not just against the guarantee of government bailout or the believed appreciation of the underlying asset.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Kaepernick Craze: Exposing the Nation's Fools One Conversation at a Time

The Kaeparnick craze and other viral movements haven't merely pressured people into becoming simpler caricatures of their prior selves, but they have manifestly exposed people for how foolish and uninformed they've been all along. 



In his final year in the NFL, Kaepernick ranked 17th in passer rating and 34th the year before that. 

He played through an entire season in only two of his six years in the league, and his best full-season performance ranks far outside of the NFL's top-250 single-season passing performances in the league's history. 

For reference, the oft-criticized Tony Romo posted a career passer rating of 97.1, as compared to Kaepernick's 88.9. 

Romo's passer rating dipped below 90 for only one season of the eleven seasons he played, whereas Kaepernick failed to eclipse the 90 mark on three of his six seasons, a full 50 percent of his time in the NFL. 

In fact, Kaepernick accomplished this feat only once if we are to discard those other two seasons in …

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century. 

Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties? 

The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery. 

It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession. 

It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860.

It was a war that would blur the lines and jurisdictions between sovereign states, that would indiscriminately sacrifice the founding principles etched …

Institutional Racism: The Sasquatch of Political Folklore

A great confusion has arisen out of the clamor of political debate, one which presupposes that any dismissal of the merits of “institutional racism” somehow equates to one’s rejection of personal struggle. 

Whereas the struggle of any individual remains always and everywhere unique and wholly personal, his common bond of complexion with others who have struggled serves inadequately as the basis for any argument which regards this commonality as the cause, or as the reason, for that veritable struggle. 

To condemn the unidentifiable and nebulous abstraction, then, by castigating an unnamed institution which persists beyond our specific capacity to recognize its power, serves only to absolve individuals of their personal responsibility, to shift blame and culpability to a specter which exists only by the creative designs of our imaginations, which exists as the scapegoat for all outcomes popularly maligned as undesirable. 

This unactionable practice, then, swiftly and categorically excuses…