Skip to main content

The Unwinnable Battle for Truth

Throughout history there have been oracles, prognosticators and soothsayers who have enchanted their audiences, as if hypnotically, to unquestioningly accept and even endorse their prophesies.

During the reign of the Roman Catholic Church, for example, parishioners have paid for indulgences to absolve themselves of sin, a custom which today seems absurd to the average reader.

There have been governments which have fleeced their own people, rounded them up and even exterminated them with the support or deafening silence of the public.

They've even conned their own peoples into wars of aggression against other civilizations they've neither known nor pointed out on a map.

Beyond the political realm, fraudsters such as Bernie Madoff have mesmerized greedy investors looking to make fast, easy returns, just as revolutionary economist John Law did in the early 18th century by exaggerating the projected fortunes which were sure to be made in the development of Louisiana, an economic disaster which would later become known as the Mississippi Bubble.

Just as Bernie Madoff's office produced fraudulent trading reports to sustain investor confidence, John Law would embark upon one of the foremost experiments with fiat currency, a failure which would inconceivably set the precedent for all to follow just a few hundred years later.

As it turns out, where there exists sweeping desperation or far-reaching aspiration, you are almost certain to find an opportunist with a suave demeanor and a tantalizing itinerary to riches.

This has been a fixture across time, and the purple rhetoric is as prominent today as it has ever been throughout history.

So it is now as important as ever to become educated on how to recognize it and perhaps insulate yourself and others from its perils. 



Whether across financial or political news media, daily discourse or the polemical protests strewn across your local college campus, much of the confusing rhetoric around any demonstration stems from a poor mastery of words and even more ambiguous interpretations which lead to further distortions of the truth, not by deliberate deceit but through the excitable yet incapable minds of those who sincerely believe what they say after accepting what they’ve heard or read.

So while the truth may be lightyears or footsteps away, waiting to be discovered by an earnest surveyor, the journey veers violently off course toward the savory remarks of the enraged orator who purports to know all of her craters, mountains and streams, doing so with utmost certainty and unflinching conviction, leaving the audience beguiled and amazed, without a shadow of doubt cast over any claim.

After the final bow, the audience then disperses under the illusion of a settled case while the orator leaves with the confidence of the world behind him, all while we are brought no closer to truth and the itch for discovery subsides, becoming dormant at the suspicion that everything worthy of discovery has already been uncovered.

And so the cycle goes, as the current of social inertia beats ceaselessly against the movement toward truth, where the bearer of curiosity is castigated as an apostate and the contrarian is cast away as a pariah, all to the benefit of hope, prayer and faith in unsupportable riches.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Kaepernick Craze: Exposing the Nation's Fools One Conversation at a Time

The Kaeparnick craze and other viral movements haven't merely pressured people into becoming simpler caricatures of their prior selves, but they have manifestly exposed people for how foolish and uninformed they've been all along. 



In his final year in the NFL, Kaepernick ranked 17th in passer rating and 34th the year before that. 

He played through an entire season in only two of his six years in the league, and his best full-season performance ranks far outside of the NFL's top-250 single-season passing performances in the league's history. 

For reference, the oft-criticized Tony Romo posted a career passer rating of 97.1, as compared to Kaepernick's 88.9. 

Romo's passer rating dipped below 90 for only one season of the eleven seasons he played, whereas Kaepernick failed to eclipse the 90 mark on three of his six seasons, a full 50 percent of his time in the NFL. 

In fact, Kaepernick accomplished this feat only once if we are to discard those other two seasons in …

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century. 

Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties? 

The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery. 

It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession. 

It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860.

It was a war that would blur the lines and jurisdictions between sovereign states, that would indiscriminately sacrifice the founding principles etched …

Institutional Racism: The Sasquatch of Political Folklore

A great confusion has arisen out of the clamor of political debate, one which presupposes that any dismissal of the merits of “institutional racism” somehow equates to one’s rejection of personal struggle. 

Whereas the struggle of any individual remains always and everywhere unique and wholly personal, his common bond of complexion with others who have struggled serves inadequately as the basis for any argument which regards this commonality as the cause, or as the reason, for that veritable struggle. 

To condemn the unidentifiable and nebulous abstraction, then, by castigating an unnamed institution which persists beyond our specific capacity to recognize its power, serves only to absolve individuals of their personal responsibility, to shift blame and culpability to a specter which exists only by the creative designs of our imaginations, which exists as the scapegoat for all outcomes popularly maligned as undesirable. 

This unactionable practice, then, swiftly and categorically excuses…