Skip to main content

War of the Worlds: Coming to a City Near You

A panicked driver moved through an angry mob of protesters yesterday in Brea, California, an Orange County city just outside of Los Angeles.

Those hundreds of protesters stormed the streets on Thursday to plea for GOP Representative Ed Royce's sympathy on the matter of their temporary protected immigration status.

The video shows 56-year-old Daniel Wenzek of Brea pressing slowly through the crowd of enraged protesters who wielded drumsticks and fists, slapping his vehicle as he gradually rolled through the intersection. 

One woman even leapt upon his vehicle in an attempt to prevent the driver from continuing through the intersection. 



Video coverage of this event shows increasing numbers of protesters surrounding this man's vehicle as it became clear that he intended to make his way through the crowd.

The woman who leapt upon his vehicle recounts the experience:

“My only thought is that I just want him to stop. I’m like, if I just jump on the car, he’s going to stop. He did stop, thank God, because if he didn’t stop, he would [have] run over a lot of people that [were] crossing the street. It was so quick.”

The videographic evidence, however, suggests otherwise, as there were apparently no further groups beyond that thin line of protestors.



The response of the driver has become the subject of popular debate, as social media has whipped into a frenzy to either scold or support him.

Of course, very few among us have ever been placed under such circumstances, so any speculation is met with an astonishing dearth of real-world experience to support it. 

In fact, this scene brings another to mind from the 2005 sci-fi thriller with Tom Cruise, War of the Worlds, in which another group of protestors bids for a place in Cruise's van. 

Cruise, with co-stars Dakota Fanning and Justin Chatwin, moves slowly through a mass of desperate protesters slapping the car and throwing glass bottles.

In this anxiety-fueling scene, the audience squirms and helplessly prays that the protagonists will survive the onslaught of unreasoning and uncivil malefactors.

The scene suddenly comes to an end when Cruise, after noticing a woman and her baby in his path, veers violently toward the curb into a utility pole.

At this time, some or most of the audience will have justifiably reached the conclusion that Cruise and his on-set children would have been manifestly better off if they had just wholly disregarded the wellbeing of the protesters, continuing through the crowd toward safety.

However, this belief system is somehow lost on those who, well-intentioned in spirit, fail to sympathize with the beleaguered driver in this real-world scenario.

For this man, the event is a classic exhibition of the fight-or-flight response within a potential life-or-death situation.

Of course, many will argue that the pedestrians benefit from statutory right-of-way, while others claim the same for the driver.

Another batch of arguments focuses upon the perceived alternatives for that driver, while conveniently suspending this point of view when considering the same for the protesters.

However, what is not necessarily known is whether the driver could have just as easily avoided this intersection.

And even despite this, the driver has still driven down a road purposefully intended for such use, while the protesters have convened there precisely for its perceived disruption to the commons.

It is for this reason that protesters seldom organize in desolate areas, for their intentions are far beyond anything remotely blending into the status quo; indeed they intend to deliberately interfere with the very comforts which the average individual enjoys, in attempt to bolster their ranks, force acquiescence or expose the human weaknesses of their opponents. 

These arguments, and ones predicated upon the letter of the law, are virtually irrelevant to a pure understanding of the circumstances which here include one set of human beings promoting a personal political interest and an individual carefully moving through them to escape their protest.

Under those circumstances, the driver and his car become a figurative half-pipe for the protestors to execute their tricks and leverage his reaction to their own political gain.

The surrounding army of protesters is positioned to use any harvestable excuse to apply their physical exclamation marks to the event, making it memorable and impossible to ignore.

Meanwhile the driver, whose intentions seemed relatively innocuous based upon the tepid speed of his car, appeared to have far more ordinary motives, maybe going home or returning to work.

Indeed, this driver seems to mirror the approach employed by Cruise in this very scene, exercising caution as he continues through the determined and unpredictable horde of people who are seemingly willing to do anything and everything to get their point across.

Ultimately, the armchair observer can always academically speculate as to the appropriate action under any given set of circumstances, yet any such interpretation operates from the naturally limited position of having not been present in the proverbial driver's seat at the time. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Goldmoney: Real Money Purposed for the Future

The institution of money entered the minds of sophisticated traders several millennia ago, when instead of bartering with limited numbers of people within the cumbersome double coincidence of wants, large-scale economies developed from the reach and transparency of commodity money which was scarce, durable, fungible, transportable, divisible, recognizable, and usable in and of itself. 

While we may appear to have transcended those primitive times and those so-called barbarous relics, the truth is that we have merely mutilated the concept of money by clandestinely replacing it with its more manipulable and abstract representative, the proverbial coat check without the coat. 

This is but the device of a large-scale social experiment run in real time, and we are its unwitting and unconsenting subjects who’ve largely never heard of the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate, much less its missions of “maximum employment” and 2-percent annual inflation.

Yet there is hope after all.

Finally, after deca…

The Kaepernick Craze: Exposing the Nation's Fools One Conversation at a Time

The Kaeparnick craze and other viral movements haven't merely pressured people into becoming simpler caricatures of their prior selves, but they have manifestly exposed people for how foolish and uninformed they've been all along. 



In his final year in the NFL, Kaepernick ranked 17th in passer rating and 34th the year before that. 

He played through an entire season in only two of his six years in the league, and his best full-season performance ranks far outside of the NFL's top-250 single-season passing performances in the league's history. 

For reference, the oft-criticized Tony Romo posted a career passer rating of 97.1, as compared to Kaepernick's 88.9. 

Romo's passer rating dipped below 90 for only one season of the eleven seasons he played, whereas Kaepernick failed to eclipse the 90 mark on three of his six seasons, a full 50 percent of his time in the NFL. 

In fact, Kaepernick accomplished this feat only once if we are to discard those other two seasons in …

Bitcoin: Are You Feeling Lucky?

The popular cryptocurrency, bitcoin, has tumbled greater than 50 percent since its all-time high set just a month ago near $20,000. 

Since then, it has traded as low as $9,000 before rebounding modestly back over the $10,000 mark. 
The short story of bitcoin (XBT) is powerfully illustrated by its graduation from its initial use case as an easy, inexpensive medium of exchange to an erratic and highly speculative risk asset which scarcely resembles anything more. 
And despite the chance that it regains steam, it is steeped equivalently in bubble territory at $9k as it is at $20k or even $100 or $100k. 
Plainly, it is a bubble at nearly any price. 
The only difference is the anchoring effect which seduces the investor into interpreting the drop as a buying opportunity. 
So while the fundamentals and the use case haven't dramatically changed since the decline, the greedy investor assumes that the price has dropped because of reasons unrelated to its future viability. 
This is wishful thinkin…