Skip to main content

The Price of Capital: Serving Your Interests, Incidentally

The assumption that credit ought to always remain cheaply available for the spurious investment, business or otherwise, is predicated upon the belief that advancements are linear, that they occur as a function of time, not as a consequence of thoughtful deliberation. 

Of course, it is the latter which determines a worthwhile investment, whereas the former simply creates busy work which was rendered feasible by the aforementioned easy access to credit and the artificially low costs of failure. 

Of course, credit creation is a luxury of savings, neither an entitlement nor an absolute benefit to the economy realized through its mere transition through the spending phase. 

The political Left tends to construct an emotionally-appealing narrative to establish the illusion that lives would improve if credit were only made more widely available for those mired in misfortune. 

Well, the theories of economics are not alone in disproving this fallacy, as even real examples of recent history illustrate the risks of artificially manipulating credit to pave the road to the purported American dream. 

After all, this was precisely the cause of the long-forgotten housing bubble and the ensuing financial crisis, and it has remained an insidious agent in the falsification of the U.S. bond and stock markets, in addition to auto loans, consumer credit, college tuition and even the reflation of an out-of-whack real estate industry. 

In summary, economic improvements take time to develop, and there is only so much savings to justify credit. 

The only way that this credit, and the risks attending its extension to hungry bidders, can be adequately assessed is through the appreciation developed through the laborious acquisition of said capital and thus the commensurate exposure to its potential loss. 

This is the point at which loss is most palpably evaluated, where the object acquires its incipient human appraisal. 

So while the sophist may produce a compelling diorama of what is possible, he is always far more likely to exhaust limitless resources to the sensational tune of promising nirvana, while the disciplined businessman operates within the reality of scarcity and shoulders the whole loss and thus conducts due diligence to ensure that resources are not going to waste, that the recipients are appropriately positioned to seriously manage the costly resources and pay back the principal and interest of the loan: this justification, known as profit potential, is the mark of a worthwhile venture, as buyers and sellers progressively coordinate services and supplies where they are most highly valued. 

This is the most objective measure by which we can reliably gauge the efficacy of resource allocation: not by what people say or promise, but rather by what they execute and deliver. 

And this is precisely why the price of capital is so profoundly important to the whole structure of an economy. 

It must be priced, first, to represent its own scarcity and its time value; second, it must act as an organic gatekeeper, preserving the capital for use based on risk, both economic and monetary, and the historic credit quality of the debtor. 

Finally, it must be priced to represent the real demand of the market, to favor viable business investment over reckless consumer extravagance. 

Incidentally, the economic community is far more handsomely rewarded by the careful employment of resources in such a way that it yields value beyond its mere cost of production than it might otherwise be by spendthrifts squandering it into oblivion. 

As renowned economist Milton Friedman once said, “Nobody spends somebody else’s money as wisely as he spends his own.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Wild: An Economics Lesson

The Keynesian mantra, in its implications, has its roots in destruction rather than truth: “In the long run, we’re all dead.” If this is your guiding principle, we are destined to differ on matters of principle and timeline. While it is true that our fates intersect in death, that does not mean that we ought to condemn our heirs to that view: the view that our work on this planet ought only to serve ourselves, and that we ought only to bear in mind the consequences within our own lifetimes.  The Keynesians, of course, prefer their outlook, as it serves their interests; it has the further benefit of appealing to other selfish people who have little interest in the future to which they'll ultimately condemn their heirs. After all, they'll be long gone by then. So, in the Keynesian view, the longterm prospects for the common currency, social stability, and personal liberty are not just irrelevant but inconvenient. In their view, regardless of the consequences, those in charge tod

America's Civil War: Not "Civil" and Not About Slavery

Virtually the entirety of South and Central America, as well as European powers Britain, Spain and France, peacefully abolished slavery — without war — in the first sixty years of the nineteenth century.  Why, then, did the United States enter into a bloody war that cost over half of the nation’s wealth, at least 800,000 lives and many hundreds of thousands more in casualties?  The answer: the War Between the States was not about slavery.  It was a war of invasion to further empower the central government and to reject state sovereignty, nullification of unconstitutional laws, and the states’ rights to secession.  It was a war that would cripple the South and witness the federal debt skyrocket from $65 million in 1860 to $2.7 billion in 1865, whose annual interest alone would prove twice as expensive as the entire federal budget from 1860. It was a war whose total cost, including pensions and the burial of veterans, was an estimated $12 billion. Likewise, it was a war that would

There's Always Another Tax: The Tragedy of the Public Park

In the San Francisco Bay Area, many residents work tirelessly throughout the year to pay tens of thousands of dollars in annual property taxes. In addition to this, they are charged an extra 10 percent on all expenses through local sales taxes. It doesn't stop there. In addition to their massive federal tax bill, the busy state of California capitalizes on the opportunity to seize another 10 percent through their own sizable state income taxes. But guess what! It doesn't stop there. No, no, no, no.  In California, there's always another tax. After all of these taxes, which have all the while been reported to cover every nook and cranny of the utopian vision, the Bay Area resident is left to face yet an additional tax at the grocery store, this time on soda. The visionaries within government, and those who champion its warmhearted intentions, label this one the "soda tax," which unbelievably includes Gatorade, the preferred beverage of athletes